• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama Already Banking on Sequestration?

    When the topic of sequestration arose during the final presidential debate Monday, President Obama declared, “It will not happen.”

    Considering that Obama has also previously declared that he would veto any bill attempting to get rid of the defense portion of the cuts unless it includes tax increases, many were surprised by the President’s reversal. Yet merely hours after the debate, the President indicated not only will he not act to stop sequestration, but that he is actually factoring the cuts into his fiscal plans for the future.

    Sequestration is a budgetary measure that will automatically cut $1.2 trillion over 10 years—nearly half of which comes from defense accounts—beginning on January 2 if Congress and the Administration do not agree on a plan to stop them. The President has routinely pointed the finger at the Republican-controlled House of Representatives for causing this doomsday scenario by passing the Budget Control Act of 2011, which mandated that the automatic cuts occur if the “super committee” could not find $1.2 trillion in additional savings.

    Nevertheless, investigative journalist Bob Woodward has indicated that the Administration was pressuring congressional leadership throughout the process to create this budgetary measure. The President assumed that Congress would either cut defense spending dramatically or agree to tax increases to avoid such cuts. A transcript from a Des Moines Register interview with the President, however, reveals that he accounted for both scenarios in his fiscal plan.

    Obama said to the Iowa paper, “So when you combine the Bush tax cuts expiring, the sequester in place, the commitment of both myself and my opponent—at least Governor Romney claims that he wants to reduce the deficit—but we’re going to be in a position where I believe in the first six months we are going to solve that big piece of business.”

    This statement ignores not only congressional objections to sequestration and its devastating effect on national security but even the warnings of his Secretary of Defense and military service chiefs. President Obama is willing to put national security at risk for fiscal goals that are questionable at best.

    During the tenure of this Administration, defense spending has absorbed roughly half of deficit reduction efforts, yet it accounts for only a fifth of total federal spending. The fact is that America could zero out its defense accounts entirely and the true debt drivers—entitlement programs—would continue on spending autopilot and eventually consume the entire federal budget.

    Regardless of what the President says, the fact remains that the debilitating defense cuts under sequestration will accomplish nothing more than reducing the military’s ability to protect America. As commander in chief, Obama should understand this and not use security as a bargaining chip. With the January 2 deadline drawing near, Congress should uphold its constitutional responsibility to provide for the common defense and work to stop these cuts without raising taxes.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Obama Already Banking on Sequestration?

    1. Stirling says:

      If he's re-elected he will have no reason to do anything to stop his agenda.. Is it a surprise to anyone that we have so many issues coming to a head at the end of this year? It's by design..

    2. Marcia says:

      There will be massive unemployment, especially here in SE Virginia. Most people I know do not expect this to happen, so it will be total chaos when it does.

    3. Bobbie says:

      It's also very unsettling that Obama can get away with murders because he used the word "terror" ONCE in a sentence although emphatically and out front used the youtube video every time, yet republicans never use the word "hate" show no sign of "racisms," have records of outstanding character but democrat base will consume time and money turning their backs on fellow Americans to accuse "hate and racism" where it doesn't exist and doesn't utilize time productively! Bearing false witness with provocation is not the role of government and defies ALL human dignity! The disappointing democrat party of political instigation, has got to go. What kind of practicing Catholic is Joe Biden? Sartholic? That's a fake that uses sarcasm in the name of Catholicism to hide his truth.

    4. Texpal says:

      Lies while looking the electorate straight in the face without flinching!!! This guy is a professional liar no doubt. The Muslim code of conduct says it is OK to lie to infidels as long as it promotes the cause….
      Does this tell you anything? I hope and pray that it does…

    5. KineticExpediency says:

      But didn't Obama say the DOD didn't have any problem with it? I guess when you have suck-ups like Petraeus that's what you get.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.