• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • VIDEO: Obama Says Sequestration "Will Not Happen"—Really?

    During the Monday night foreign policy debate, President Obama surprised the audience with the statement that sequestration “will not happen.” Either this was a gaffe or he pulled off the next deft move in the political/legislative sequestration battle.

    Governor Romney was questioning the President’s policies on military cuts, and Obama brushed aside the criticism and dismissed the issue that has split Washington for the last six months.

    On one side are legislators against these mandated draconian cuts, many defense analysts, and even the President’s own Secretary of Defense. On the other is Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D–NV) and—everyone thought, until Monday—the White House.

    Obama declared that “the sequester is not something that I’ve proposed. It is something that the Congress has proposed.” This was characterized as “mistaken” by Bob Woodward, who stood behind the account of the genesis of this problem in his book The Price of Politics, in which high-ranking Obama aides brought the entire concept to Reid and then sold it to congressional Republicans. Woodward reiterated later, “What the President said is not correct.”

    Obama next flatly stated, “It will not happen.” This stunned the wonks and legislators listening, because—despite Press Secretary Jay Carney’s protestations that this has been Obama’s position all along—this is a huge departure from the President’s repeated declaration that he would veto any solution that did not include massive new tax increases.

    The final “move” was the immediate deployment of a phalanx of messaging personnel to walk it back as soon as the debate cameras were off and the voters were no longer listening. The end result: two very different messages to two very different audiences.

    There are efficiencies that can be wrung from the defense budget, but the sequestration cuts are not the right way to get them. The inordinate cuts (47 percent of the total cuts under sequestration come from defense, which is less than 20 percent of government spending) should be offset with cuts to other spending.

    For example, entitlement programs are by far the largest and fastest-growing portion of the budget, yet they are essentially untouched by the Budget Control Act and sequestration. Most other spending has grown across the board and should also be brought under control. In short, there are plenty of places that need reductions. But harmful tax hikes are not the answer, regardless of how much Obama and Reid want them.

    An adult answer should be developed through a real bipartisan effort to address the needs of the nation for the common defense and for fiscal health. Thus far, there has been much political, verbal, and public relations maneuvering but little willingness on the part of the White House and Senate leadership to have a productive discussion.

    The President seems to want to have his cake and eat it, too. His flipping during the debate—and flopping back as soon as the microphones are off—is unhelpful.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to VIDEO: Obama Says Sequestration "Will Not Happen"—Really?

    1. Wayne says:

      Heard about this on Rush. Thank you for reporting what I have long known. Our news media does not report the facts. They are more into tabloid news and hollywood.

    2. Bobbie says:

      Ahh, isn't that nice? He had a change of heart! NOT! What a disgrace in American leadership. What kind of man is it that lies by nature and believes that to be acceptable in any position to any people of honor and respect and common in America? Unstable man!! He's not GIVING IN meaning he will go to any extent and after showing more concern over the hurt feelings of terrorists than recognize the seriousness of his faults regarding the inhumane acts against Americans he defied his duty to protect, he goes on talk shows he talks about the scary man who made the video that even the most easily offended wouldn't make a choice to see if they had one, let alone kill innocent men over! Are Americans in America next? My terrible trauma since Obama is up to 7 deaths! In less than 4 years! with absolutely no legitimate medical reason that preventative care was provided to be sure wouldn't happen. Very troubling, very disgustingly troubling…

      There was so much that could've been done in protection and security at the very beginning of Mr. Stevens career in Benghazi. The current President couldn't protect four men how are we suppose to trust he's protecting America?!!!

    3. Meet_Joe_Black says:

      He is such a liar! We need to cut the welfare programs and wasteful spending like cowboy poetry festivals. Defense is how we protect our children, why don't they understand? I cant wait for Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan to come to washington. We need the adults back in charge!

    4. Margaret says:

      There is nothing this president says that can be trusted. He says what he wants us to hear……
      and then changes it as soon as he leaves his audience.

    5. obama is not on the side of America! Impeaxh him NOW!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.