Editorializing on the Lieberman-Warner cap and trade bill set to be debated in the Senate next week, the Wall Street Journal writes: “For a bill as grandly ambitious as Warner-Lieberman, very few staff, much less Senators, even know what’s in it. The press corps mainly cheerleads this political fad, without examining how it would work or what it would cost.” Eager to prove the WSJ correct the New York Times editorializes today: “The Senate last addressed climate change in 2003 when it cast 43 votes in favor of a bill …
