• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Printing Money: Adopt a New Typeface and Save $136 Million in the Federal Budget

    Photo: Getty Images

    Photo: Getty Images

    The federal government can make a decision that would save taxpayers millions of dollars, and it wouldn’t have to cut programs, furlough workers, or even reduce duplicative spending: All it has to do is adopt a new uniform typeface to be used in all government documents.

    That’s right—saving $136 million is as easy as switching from Times New Roman to Garamond. The proposal was made by Suvir Mirchandani, a clever 14 year-old from Pittsburgh who realized that “ink is two times more expensive than French perfume by volume.” Suvir’s idea began as a science project that sought to reduce operating expenses within his Pennsylvania middle school.

    By analyzing different typefaces, Suvir discovered that the font Garamond would take up far less space on a page than other fonts, thus saving ink and therefore money. He then considered the vast amount of material that the government prints—the federal budget is $1.8 billion for printing-related expenditures—and realized his ideas could save some serious cash.

    After analyzing five different government documents, Suvir found that using Garamond reduced coverage (the space covered by ink per page) by about 29 percent when compared to the original font used on each document. Given that a Government Services Administration study estimated that ink costs constituted 26 percent of printing costs—or $467 million in 2014—Suvir determined that by implementing his recommendation, the federal government would save $136 million. Extrapolating this change across state and local governments would yield another $97 million in savings for the taxpayer.

    Although Suvir’s study was limited by the information he could consider (the government did not supply relevant printing data despite his multiple requests), his preliminary evaluation reveals that there is an easy way for the government to cut down on costs while implementing a uniform standard across government documents. A first-pass look at the Government Printing Office guidelines reveals that there is no standard font designation for government document submission, as customers are only urged to submit PostScript Type 1 (the industry standard) style fonts. Indeed, Canada designated an official government typeface through its Federal Identity Program, noting that “a consistent typography is fundamental to corporate identity,” and Australia includes an official typeface as a requirement of its government branding.

    It simply does not make sense to carry on with a lax font standard for government documents that uses more ink than necessary. Aesthetics aside, Suvir’s idea provides an easy solution to a government-wide issue that would save millions of taxpayer dollars. If the bureaucracy is unable or unwilling to consider the measure, it is further evidence of how byzantine our government has become.

    Posted in Front Page [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×