• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Four Businesses Whose Owners Were Penalized for Their Religious Beliefs

    Editor’s note: Amid the heated debate over Arizona’s SB 1062 law, which aims to protect religious liberty, it’s worth looking back at some of the ways that religious beliefs have come under attack in the public square in recent years. The language in this post that is quoted originally appeared in a National Review Online article by Ryan T. Anderson and Leslie Ford. Kelsey Harris also contributed to this article.

    1. Elane Photography

    Elane Huguenin and her husband, Jon, run Elane Photography, a small business in Albuquerque, N.M.

    Alliance Defending Freedom

    Alliance Defending Freedom

    Back in 2006, the couple declined a request to photograph a same-sex ceremony because of a difference in beliefs. Elane explained:

    “The message a same-sex commitment ceremony communicates is not one I believe.”

    Elane Photography never refused to take pictures of gay and lesbian individuals, but it did decline to photograph a same-sex ceremony. Meanwhile, other photographers in the Albuquerque area were more than happy to photograph the event — and Elane has no problem giving them that business.

    Getty Images

    Getty Images

    But in 2008, the New Mexico Human Rights Commission ruled that the Huguenins had discriminated based on sexual orientation. The commission ordered them to pay $6,637.94 in attorneys’ fees.

    At the end of 2013, the New Mexico Supreme Court upheld the Human Rights Commission. It concluded that under the state’s sexual-orientation and gender-identity law, “the First Amendment does not protect a photographer’s freedom to decline to take pictures of a same-sex commitment ceremony even when doing so would violate the photographer’s deeply held religious beliefs.”

    Elane Photography has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for review of its case.

    AZ-petition

    2. Sweet Cakes by Melissa

    When Rachel Cryer and Laurel Bowman asked the Oregon bakery Sweet Cakes by Melissa to bake a wedding cake for their same-sex commitment ceremony in 2013, Sweet Cakes declined the request.

    FRC/KATU News

    FRC/KATU News

    The bakery owners consistently served all customers on a regular basis, but making a cake for the Cryer and Bowman would have required them to facilitate and celebrate a same-sex relationship — which would violate their religious belief that marriage is the union of one man and one woman.

    Getty Images

    Getty Images

    It’s a value derived from their very-open Christian beliefs. Check out this picture the bakery shared on their Facebook wall.

    Sweet Cakes Facebook Page

    Sweet Cakes Facebook Page

    P.S. — Oregon law defines marriage as being between one man and one woman, too.

    But the lesbian couple filed a complaint under the Oregon Equality Act of 2007, which prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation. In January, the agency issued a ruling that held that the Sweet Cakes by Melissa violated Oregon’s sexual-orientation law when by refusing to bake the cake.

    As the story gained local media attention, the owners, Melissa and Aaron Klein, immediately faced threats, vicious protests, and boycotts.

    KATU News

    KATU News

    Fearing for their safety, the Kleins closed Sweet Cakes by Melissa in September 2013.

    Sweet Cakes Facebook Page

    Sweet Cakes Facebook Page

    3. Masterpiece Cakeshop

    Meet Jack Phillips, who owns Masterpiece Cakeshop in Colorado.

    FairToAll.org

    FairToAll.org

    He declined to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding reception for these guys:

    CBS News

    CBS News

    In 2012, the couple received a marriage license in Massachusetts and asked Phillips to bake a cake for a reception back home in Denver. But because of his faith, Phillips declined to create a wedding cake:

    “I don’t feel like I should participate in their wedding, and when I do a cake, I feel like I am participating in the ceremony or the event or the celebration that the cake is for.”

    But the American Civil Liberties Union disagrees. They “filed a complaint against Masterpiece Cakeshop with the state, alleging violations of Colorado’s public-accommodation law. Administrative Law Judge Robert N. Spencer ruled against the bakery on December 6, 2013, concluding that Phillips violated the law by refusing service to the two men ‘because of their sexual orientation.’”

    Phillips’ response: objection.

    Getty Images

    Getty Images

    He said he’d happily sell the couple his baked goods for any number of occasions, but baking a wedding cake would force him to express something that he does not believe, violating his freedom to run his business in step with his faith.

    “It’s just the wedding cake, not the people. Not the lifestyle. … We’d close down the bakery before we compromise our beliefs.”

    4. Arlene’s Flowers

    Barronelle Stutzman owns Arlene’s Flowers and Gifts in Washington State.

    FairToAll.org

    FairToAll.org

    Her longtime customers Roger Ingersoll and Curt Freed requested she arrange the flowers for their same-sex wedding ceremony.

    Stutzman responded that she “could not accept the job because of her ‘relationship with Jesus Christ’ and her belief that marriage is between one man and one woman.”

    Getty Images

    Getty Images

    But the couple filed a complaint and Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson filed suit “against Stutzman, contending that she had violated the state’s sexual-orientation law.”

    Now Stutzman faces $2,000 fine, a court order, and outrage from local residents. Here’s a Facebook page with 626 supporters.

    Faceboook.com

    Boycott Arlene’s Flower’s  Facebook Page

    As these cases show, religious liberty and discrimination are almost certainly matters that both courts and citizens will tackle and struggle with in the upcoming years.

    Posted in Culture, Front Page [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Four Businesses Whose Owners Were Penalized for Their Religious Beliefs

    1. Pingback: Four Businesses Whose Owners Were Penalized for Their Religious Beliefs

    2. Pingback: Hey, progressives: What else can you force Americans to do? | BuzzPoBuzzPo

    3. Burton Meisner says:

      A business performs its service for a fee. That service does not indicate that the business supports or does not support the point of view of its customer. If the business is soliciting to serve the public, it should do so. Anything short of that is clearly discriminatory, not freedom of speech. Heritage is on the wrong side of the fence on this issue. Respect for a diversity of ideas is what distinguishes this nation from others.

    4. Pingback: Feeling decidely un-Christian tonight | Hoystory

    5. carlos says:

      1Corinthians 6:9-11
      Don’t you realize that those who do wrong will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Don’t fool yourselves. Those who indulge in sexual sin, or who worship idols, or commit adultery, or are male prostitutes, or practice homosexuality, or are thieves, or greedy people, or drunkards, or are abusive, or cheat people-none of these will inherit the Kingdom of God. Some of you were once like that. But you were cleansed; you were made holy; you were made right with God by calling on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

    6. Danny says:

      It’s definitely a violation of their religious beliefs to make them make the cakes or make the flowers for these gay people. A definite violation of their 1st Amendment rights let’s remember what they are the minorities the majority believe in God and that’s the law and it is God’s law

    7. poney81 says:

      It’s so funny that liberals will make the argument against THEMSELVES and are too stupid to realize it!!! Burton Meissner in the third comment put it beautifully and I quote “respect for a diversity of ideas is what distinguishes our nation from others”. they are such hypocrites, its respect their ideals, and only hold to their ideals, because they won’t tolerate other ideas or opinions except their own. sadly, when it comes to Christians this country is absolutely intolerant and has nothing but animosity towards their religious beliefs. This is supposed to be a free country and a free market, private business owners are supposed to have the right to serve or not serve whomever they wish, this is not about being anti gay, it’s about being Pro religious freedom. They are not going to hang a sign on their doors that read ” NO GAYS ALLOWED”, that’s absurd to even think that, what it’s about is forcing them to take part in a ceremony that violates their religious beliefs.so again I ask what happened to the rights of those business owners?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×