• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama's Heavy-Duty Audacity

    President Obama grabbed headlines this week for (supposedly) bypassing Congress to advance his global warming agenda. As part of what aides characterize as a “muscular and unilateral campaign” to reduce greenhouse gases, the President directed his Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and his Department of Transportation (DOT) to tighten fuel-efficiency standards for heavy-duty trucks.

    Environmentalists swooned, of course, and the media dutifully carried the message far and wide that Obama will do whatever it takes to defeat carbon dioxide, Congress be damned.

    Well, not quite.

    The truth is that the EPA and the DOT already announced back in August 2011 their intent to issue more stringent greenhouse gas standards for 2018 and beyond—the very same years cited by the President. Stricter rules for model years 2014 to 2018 have already been imposed by the agencies (at a cost of $8 billion).

    And neither the President’s pen nor his phone empowered them to act. The real authority resides not in the Oval Office but rather in 42 U.S. Code § 7521—Emission Standards for New Motor Vehicles or New Motor Vehicle Engines, compliments of the Clean Air Act.

    For better or worse, the EPA administrator is obligated by law to prescribe “standards applicable to the emission of any air pollutant from any class or classes of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines, which in his judgment cause, or contribute to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.”

    That’s not to say that this President isn’t well-practiced in unilateral action—abusive, unlawful, or otherwise, as Heritage scholars Elizabeth Slattery and Andrew Kloster have documented. But it’s simply bad form, embarrassing even, that he’s claiming credit for rather routine actions set in motion by Congress passing the Clean Air Act of 1970—when he was in grade school.

    Posted in Economics, Front Page [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.