• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Maryland’s Attempts to Cut Off NSA Utilities Are Unconstitutional

    Since the Edward Snowden leaks to The Guardian began last year, the National Security Agency (NSA) has been a political hot potato. Yet, whatever you think of the NSA, it is clearly a federal agency authorized by federal statute. Some lawmakers in the state of Maryland—home to the NSA’s headquarters in Ft. Meade—have recently proposed an unconstitutional fix: They want to cut off electricity and water to the building.

    This scheme forgets the basics of our constitutional system. Changes to the NSA must come at the federal level: Congress can direct legislative changes; the President can manage the agency consistent with statute and his Article II authority; federal courts can ensure that the NSA’s actions comply with statute and the Constitution. States, however, have no business discriminating against federal agencies.

    Article VI, clause 2 of the Constitution—the Supremacy Clause—reads:

    This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

    Ever since 1819, in a case called McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court of the United States has held that “the States have no power, by taxation or otherwise, to retard, impede, burden, or in any manner control the operations of the constitutional laws enacted by Congress to carry into execution the powers vested in the General Government.” Nearly 200 years later it seems Maryland has still not learned that lesson.

    If the law authorizing the NSA is constitutionally valid, then such direct, obvious attempts to interfere with the NSA by state legislators are clearly unconstitutional. These attempts are so plainly out of bounds that the taxpayers of the state of Maryland might even be on the hook for Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys’ fees when the DOJ inevitably sues in federal court to keep the power on and the water running.

    Does this mean the NSA is above the law? Of course not. Members of the United States Congress can still pass laws; the President can still exercise his discretion to change NSA policy; and federal courts can still entertain lawsuits against the NSA. Perhaps federal officials will not do any of this. However, federal officials playing it safe does not authorize state governments to effectively nullify federal law.

    Posted in Legal [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×