• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Let Them Eat Cupcakes: 11-Year-Old Entrepreneur’s Dreams Crushed by Overregulation

    2014_02_04_CupcakeOverCrim_Bernick

    Like aspiring American entrepreneurs throughout our country’s history, 11-year-old Chloe Stirling wanted to help herself by helping others. Determined to save money for a car when she comes of age, Chloe baked, sold, and donated cupcakes for two years. She ran her business, called, “Hey, Cupcake!” out of her parents’ kitchen in Troy, Illinois.

    >>> Check Out: George Will: Media Should Regard IRS Scandal Like Watergate, Iran-Contra

    Ironically, it was Chloe’s success that got her in trouble. After a local paper lauded her creative cupcaking, the Madison County Health Department took notice and told her to close up shop.

    What were they thinking? Section 750.1360 of the Illinois Food Service Sanitation Code requires that a kitchen used for a “food service operation” must be separate from any “living areas,” including the family kitchen. Chloe’s mother, Heather Stirling, told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that officials said that the family would need to buy a bakery or a separate kitchen for Chloe.

    Heather’s reaction says it all: “A separate kitchen? Who can do that?”

    Not our problem, say local officials. “The rules are the rules. It’s for the protection of the public health,” health department spokesperson Amy Yeager said, according to the  Post-Dispatch. “The guidelines apply to everyone.”

    As Chief Justice John Roberts once wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court in Gonzalez v. O Centro (2006), this statement “echoes the classic rejoinder of bureaucrats throughout history: If I make an exception for you, I’ll have to make one for everybody, so no exceptions.”

    Discretion is inherent to law enforcement. Every decision to enforce a law diverts resources from other priorities. So it’s worth asking whether there is any reason to think that this instance of unauthorized cupcake production endangers the public health. Otherwise, we’re justified in asking whether local health authorities have better things to do with taxpayer money.

    Yes, the rules are the rules. And it’s reasonable to require that those who sell food to the public conform to certain standards. But there’s nothing that encourages contempt for rules like the unthinking application of them. And it’s hard to think of a means better calculated to discouraging young entrepreneurs than draping them in red tape the moment they show a propensity to “truck, barter, and exchange.”

    Chloe’s business is the stuff that dreams are made of. For the sake of Chloe’s customers, Chloe’s community, and Chloe, Hey, Cupcake! should be allowed to remain in business.

    Posted in Featured, Front Page, Legal [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×