• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Federal Workforce Grew 14 Percent in 8 Years



    The federal non-postal civilian workforce has grown by 14 percent from 2004 to 2012 – mostly on account of permanent career employees – according to a GAO report on trends in federal employment released last week.

    “The recession largely bypassed the Federal government,” explained James Sherk, a Senior Policy Analyst at The Heritage Foundation. “While the private sector still has not recovered the jobs lost during the 2008-2009 downturn, the Federal government has substantially more employees than it did in late 2007.”

    The “workforce grew by 258,882 employees, from 1.88 million to 2.13 million” from 2004 to 2012, while “[s]pending on total government-wide compensation for each full-time equivalent (FTE) position grew by an average of 1.2 percent per year, from $106,097 in 2004 to $116,828 in 2012,” according to the report.

    The report noted that “the Departments of Defense (DOD), Homeland Security (DHS), and Veterans Affairs (VA) – accounted for about 94 percent” of the workforce increase.

    Per employee, “spending rose at an average annual rate of 1 percent per year (a 7.9 percent increase overall).”

    “On average federal employees make more than equivalently skilled workers in the private sector,” Sherk noted. “Federal employees should not have to make financial sacrifices to serve the public, but they shouldn’t get overpaid either. The government should aim for parity between private and government pay.”

    A 2012 CBO report revealed that “[f]ederal workers whose education culminated in a bachelor’s degree averaged 15 percent higher total compensation than their private-sector counterparts,” while average benefits for the same category of federal workers “were 46 percent higher.”

    Meanwhile, the GAO found that a growing number of “retirement-eligible employees in the years ahead may be cause for concern: Their retirement could produce mission critical skills gaps if left unaddressed.”

    “The government allows its employees to retire in their mid-to-late 50s with a full pension,” Sherk said. “Congress should raise the federal retirement age to the Social Security retirement age.”

    According to The Washington Post, Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) claimed in December that a pay raise for federal employees under the Ryan-Murray budget deal would be justified. “Because of this agreement, federal employees can get their cost-of-living increase and they will no longer face the uncertainties of furloughs and pay cuts,” she said.

    This story was produced by The Foundry’s news team. Nothing here should be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation.

    Posted in Capitol Hill, Front Page [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.