• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Keystone XL Pipeline: Still Environmentally Safe

    Jim West/ZUMA Press/Newscom

    Jim West/ZUMA Press/Newscom

    President Obama has punted on Keystone XL so many times, it seems like he could have covered the 1,700-mile route of the oil pipeline. With this afternoon’s release of  a positive “final environmental impact statement” by the State Department, though, he should do what he should have done a long time ago: Give the green light to finishing the northern route of Keystone XL.

    State’s latest environmental impact statement — the first under Secretary John Kerry — largely draws the same conclusions of its past environmental impact statements.  It finds that the pipeline, a Canada-based project to deliver up to 830,000 barrels of oil per day to Gulf Coast refineries, would pose no significant environmental risk and would not contribute substantially to carbon dioxide emissions.

    In a speech last June, President Obama said the climate effects of Keystone XL would have an impact on the Administration’s ultimate decision. The reality is that the pipeline’s climate effects would be minimal.

    The final environmental impact statement concludes “that approval or denial of any one crude oil transport project, including the proposed project, is unlikely to  significantly affect the rate of extraction in the oil  sands or the continued demand for heavy crude oil at  refineries in the United States based on expected oil prices, oil sands supply costs, transport costs, and  supply demand scenarios.”

    Even those who believe that climate change is heading toward catastrophic outcomes note that Keystone XL is only 0.2 percent of the “carbon budget.”

    Opponents also will minimize the job numbers, saying that the pipeline will create only “a handful” of permanent jobs — and that’s correct. But that argument also dismisses the tens of thousands of construction jobs that the pipeline project will create.  In fact, simply building the southern portion—which didn’t need the President’s approval—has already created 4,000 construction jobs.

    Keystone XL also will add economic value, can be built without the help of the taxpayer, will result in billions of dollars of tax revenue for states it runs through, and will provide a stable supply of oil from Canada, an important trading partner.

    It’s now up to President Obama to determine whether Keystone XL is in the national interest.  Let’s go for it this time, Mr. President, rather than punt again.

    Posted in Energy, Front Page [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×