- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -
Supreme Court Stays Obamacare Mandate for Little Sisters of the Poor
Posted By Sarah Torre On January 2, 2014 @ 5:39 pm In Culture,Front Page,Legal,Obamacare | Comments Disabled
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor really knows how to ring in the New Year. Just hours before the countdown to 2014 in Times Square, she granted  the Little Sisters of the Poor an eleventh-hour temporary halt to a coercive Obamacare mandate. The Obama Administration has until 10 a.m. Friday to respond to the stay.
Without that emergency injunction, the Catholic charity would have been forced to direct its insurance provider to include abortion-inducing drugs and contraception in its health plan on January 1.
The Little Sisters of the Poor  provide free and compassionate care to over 13,000 poor elderly men and women in over 30 countries. Founded in the United States over 150 years ago, sisters in this Roman Catholic religious order dedicate their lives to running homes for the most vulnerable elderly, vowing to care for individuals with dignity and respect and treat them as Christ would.
“The elderly are at risk, with no one to speak up for them, no one to stand up and to express to the world and show the world that these people are still valuable,” explains  Sister Mary Bernard.
Yet under Obamacare, this same community of sisters would be forced to violate the very faith that motivates them to serve in the first place.
Countless other religious charities, hospitals, and schools face impossible decisions in the New Year. At the renewal of their health plans in 2014, religious organizations will be forced to get in line with the Obamacare mandate or face devastating penalties to the tune of up to $100 per employee per day.
For the Little Sisters of the Poor, that could mean millions of dollars  a year diverted from the care of elderly women and men to pay for onerous government fines.
With a defiance characteristic of the Administration’s response to Obamacare’s critics, the White House quickly responded  to Sotomayor’s ruling, saying it is “confident” the coercive mandate would win in court. The Administration pointed to a so-called accommodation, but that unworkable policy  doesn’t adequately protect religious organizations.
Federal courts aren’t buying the White House’s “accommodations” and bureaucratic tinkering. There are now more than 300 individuals, charities, schools, and family businesses suing over the coercive rule . To date, federal judges have granted temporary stays against the mandate in nearly 90 percent  of the cases they’ve considered—including a flurry of injunctions  for nonprofit charities and schools over the past week.
A recent survey shows nearly 60 percent of likely voters  oppose the Obamacare mandate. The same poll found that 54 percent of likely voters disapprove of the health care law overall.
This spring, the justices will consider  challenges to the mandate by the Green family, which owns Hobby Lobby, and the Hahn family, which runs Conestoga Wood Specialties.
The Supreme Court should recognize Obamacare’s serious assault on Americans’ religious liberty by ruling against the mandate. In the meantime, Congress can start disassembling the rest of Obamacare and work toward patient-centered reforms  that respect American freedoms and values.
Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2014/01/02/supreme-court-stays-obamacare-mandate-little-sisters-poor/
URLs in this post:
 granted: http://www.becketfund.org/scotusgrantsrelief/
 Little Sisters of the Poor: http://www.littlesistersofthepoor.org/
 explains: http://www.becketfund.org/littlesisters/
 millions of dollars: http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2014/01/01/fighting-obamacares-contraception-mandate/
 quickly responded: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/obamacare-birth-control-mandate-101673.html?ml=po_r
 unworkable policy: http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2013/7/charade-continues-with-obamacares-hhs-mandate
 more than 300 individuals, charities, schools, and family businesses suing over the coercive rule: http://www.becketfund.org/hhsinformationcentral/
 nearly 90 percent: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/367415/88-percent-religious-freedom-kathryn-jean-lopez
 flurry of injunctions: http://www.adfmedia.org/News/PRDetail/8749
 nearly 60 percent of likely voters: http://www.frc.org/newsroom/new-poll-59-percent-oppose-obamacares-hhs-mandate-opposition-builds-as-consequences-become-clear
 consider: http://blog.heritage.org/2013/11/26/supreme-court-hear-challenges-obamacare-anti-conscience-mandate/
 patient-centered reforms: http://blog.heritage.org/2013/11/01/the-conservative-alternative-to-obamacare/
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.