• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama Debunks Claim of Republican Obstruction on Judicial Nominations

    BL-obama-judicial-nominees

    President Obama recently highlighted his success with judicial nominations, saying:

    We are remaking the courts…[and] when it comes to the district court, [we are] matching the pace of previous Presidents. When it comes to the appellate court, we’re just a little bit behind.

    This statement stands in stark contrast to the tale of Republican obstruction that President Obama and his supporters have been weaving for months. Indeed, the numbers tell a different story: When comparing Obama’s nominations to President Bush’s at the same point in his second term, Obama outpaces Bush by a ratio of 2-to-1.

    President Obama is now facing opposition over a trio of nominees to the D.C. Circuit. On Tuesday, Senate Republicans halted the confirmation of Cornelia Pillard, less than two weeks after stopping another nominee to that court. A vote on the third nominee is expected to come up soon.

    Perhaps even more of his nominees would be confirmed if President Obama focused on courts that desperately need more judges, rather than on the underworked D.C. Circuit. Presidents are always tempted to fill up the D.C. Circuit because it acts as a watchdog over the executive branch and hears appeals involving many federal agencies. It is also widely regarded as a stepping stone to the Supreme Court. Four current Supreme Court justices were once D.C. Circuit judges.

    Both sides of the aisle have fought hard over nominees to this court, and both have suffered from those battles—just ask former nominees Peter Keisler, Miguel Estrada, and Caitlin Halligan. To address the problem, Senator Chuck Grassley (R–IA) introduced legislation earlier this year that would eliminate the three open seats on the D.C. Circuit and move two of them to other courts that need more judges. As Senator Rob Portman (R–OH), a co-sponsor of the bill, wrote last week, this would “help bring about a reasonable end to the destructive partisan fights to which both parties have contributed.” That’s an admirable goal, but whether the Senate will act on this legislation rather than continue fighting over the D.C. Circuit remains to be seen.

    Posted in Capitol Hill, Front Page, Legal [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×