• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Liberals Angry About Food Stamp Program "Cuts" They Supported



    Food stamp program benefits decreased at the beginning of November when a temporary boost from the 2009 stimulus package expired. This reduction is now being dubbed a “cut” by the very members of Congress who voted to speed this expiration.

    The food stamp boost was set to last until 2015, but liberals voted to divert funding to a $10 billion bailout package and President Obama’s Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act. Now the left is protesting because the expiration they voted for is becoming a reality.

    Food stamp advocates are attempting to use the debate over the expiration of the stimulus boost to put off much-needed reforms to policies that have expanded the program far beyond the population it was originally intended to serve.

    One such policy favored by the Obama Administration allows states to bypass asset tests, making households with considerable savings eligible for food stamps. Known as Broad Based Categorical Eligibility, this policy enables people to walk into food stamp offices, receive brochures paid for by another welfare program, such as the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, and become “categorically eligible” for food stamps—without the normally required asset test.

    Liberals also resist work requirements for able-bodied welfare recipients, even though the vast majority of Americans support them. Under current food stamp law, able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs) are supposed to at least do part-time work or workfare or their benefits are subject to a time limit. Most states have been able to waive the work requirement for years, allowing ABAWDs to remain on the rolls indefinitely without meeting any work requirement. ABAWD participation is twice as high as it was in 2007, but even in good economic times over half of all food stamp households contain an able-bodied adult who performs no work.

    Food stamp program spending has been climbing rapidly for decades. Since 2000, it has quadrupled, from about $20 billion annually to nearly $80 billion. It is just one of 80 different means-tested programs in a welfare system that now costs over $920 billion a year. Total welfare spending has increased by a third since Obama came to office and has jumped 16-fold (adjusted for inflation) since the War on Poverty began in the 1960s.

    Ignoring the ever-increasing cost of the current system, liberals continue to clamor for a bigger welfare state. They ignore the fact that rates of self-sufficiency have been stagnant since the 1960s: America’s welfare system has failed its poor. Programs to help the poor are needed, but problematic policies that grow these programs unnecessarily and discourage work must be reformed.

    Posted in Capitol Hill, Economics, Front Page [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.