• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama's Promise of "Competition" in Obamacare: Also False

    Here’s what the President said in 2009:

    My guiding principle is, and always has been, that consumers do better when there is choice and competition. That’s how the market works. Unfortunately, in 34 states, 75 percent of the insurance market is controlled by five or fewer companies. In Alabama, almost 90 percent is controlled by just one company. And without competition, the price of insurance goes up and quality goes down.

    Heritage expert Alyene Senger has bad news for President Obama: Obamacare did absolutely nothing to fix that.

    “In the vast majority of states, the number of insurers competing in the state’s exchange is actually less than the number of carriers that previously sold individual market policies in the state,” Senger reveals in a new report.

    That’s right—unsurprisingly, Obamacare made another problem worse.

    In Alabama—the state the President mentioned with concern in 2009—about 96 percent of that state’s counties will have only one insurer offering coverage in the exchange. This means the residents in those counties will have no choice of insurer in the exchange.

    State exchange plans are offered—and priced—on a local basis. So Senger dug down to the county level to find out what Americans are facing.

    The result: In more than half of the counties in the U.S., people have only one or two insurance carriers offering coverage on their exchanges.

    map-MBnov12

    So not only are Americans facing higher premiums on the Obamacare exchanges, but they also face very limited choice in terms of their insurers.

    Sure, one carrier could offer multiple plans, but as Senger explains:

    While each participating insurer may offer multiple plans, the number of plans offered has little significance, because most are variations on the same basic design. Since Obamacare requires all exchange plans to offer a standardized minimum level of benefits, the differences between the plans is found mostly in variations on cost-sharing levels.

    The bottom line: “The standardization of benefits combined with a lack of insurer competition means consumers in Obamacare’s exchanges will have very little choice.”

    obamacare-alternative

    Read the Morning Bell and more en español every day at Heritage Libertad.

    Quick Hits:

    Posted in Front Page, Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×