• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • In China, the Party Still Controls the Gun

    Yao Dawei/ZUMA Press/Newscom

    Yao Dawei/ZUMA Press/Newscom

    General Peng Yong, commander of the Xinjiang Military District in China’s Lanzhou Military Region (MR), has reportedly been fired from the Xinjiang Chinese Communist Party (CCP) standing committee—the top leadership organization for the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region.

    This was apparently in response to this past week’s incident, where a Uyghur-driven car laden with gas cans crashed near Tiananmen Square, killing two bystanders as well as the three people in the car, and injured another 40.

    The decision to remove General Peng from the party standing committee highlights several key points.

    First, and perhaps most important, is that it is a reminder of just how integrated the military and civilian leaders are in China—and not just at the national level. Senior military commanders heading military districts (MRs are comprised of several military districts, each of which is usually aligned with provincial borders) serve on their respective provincial party standing committees. This creates regular opportunities for military and civilian leaders to exchange information, resolve issues (e.g., “Your people are causing too many fights”), facilitate civil–military integration (e.g., food, housing), etc.

    This is not to say that the military doesn’t have views distinct from the civilians, but claims of a “rogue” Chinese military that is somehow making decisions independent of the civilian leadership are simply false. As a Party-army, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is the armed wing of the CCP. It does not owe its main respect and loyalty to the Chinese constitution, but to the CCP. Party indoctrination, bureaucratic ties, and regular interaction with civilian leaders—including through the provincial Party standing committees—facilitate civil–military relations.

    Second, it’s also an interesting insight into how the PLA is different from our own in terms of personnel rotation. Chinese military commanders tend to stay in the same system. This would, again, argue against the oft-heard assumption of a rogue PLA—you’d want to rotate people around so as to prevent cabals from forming. Conversely, it builds up a fair amount of expertise about local conditions (e.g., high mountain operations in the Chengdu MR, amphibious operations in the Nanjing and Guangzhou MR).

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.