• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Missile Defense in Romania Upsets Russia

    PASCAL SAURA/AFP/Getty Images/Newscom

    PASCAL SAURA/AFP/Getty Images/Newscom

    The United States and Romania recently began construction on a Romanian-based missile defense system, also known as Aegis Ashore. This critical event is requisite to build a comprehensive multilayered missile defense system. And it’s making Russia nervous.

    Moscow (predictably) continues to incorrectly contend that the new system is directed toward it, even though the Administration’s position has been, and continues to be, that the defensive missile shield is for Middle Eastern threats. The Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) system is defensive relying on the SM-3 interceptors’ kinetic power to destroy ballistic threats through mid-air collision.

    Russia is expected to permanently deploy their S-400 and S-500 (currently in development) anti-aircraft and missile systems in response to the new Romanian–U.S. missile defense site. The purpose would be to garner political pressure against the U.S.’s decision to build the site with a possible goal of ending its construction.

    The new Romanian-based missile defense site is vital for countering potential Middle Eastern ballistic missiles threats. According to the State Department, once it becomes operational in 2015, the U.S. and NATO will gain an added missile interceptor site, and Romania will gain “situational awareness into operations at the ballistic missile defense facility, which includes receiving information on ballistic missiles tracked by the missile defense system and the status of the U.S. missile defense of Europe.” Both parties will also gain added cooperation due to U.S. military, government, and support personnel being based at the Deveselu Air Base in Romania.

    The Romanian-based Aegis Ashore system should be applauded. However, the Obama Administration has imposed various limitations on the U.S. ballistic missile defense system. Such drastic reductions may not allow the U.S. to keep pace with the advancing ballistic missile threat.

    John Collick is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please click here.

    Posted in International, Security [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.