• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Potential Chinese Missile Deal with Turkey Causing Worry



    Western bewilderment over a potential Chinese long-range ballistic missile and air defense system in Turkey has turned to skepticism and worry.

    Turkey—a NATO member—is working on an agreement to produce this system in collaboration with China Precision Machinery Import and Export Corporation (CPMIEC), a state-owned arms manufacturer on which the U.S. placed sanctions in 2003 and February 2013 for illegally selling arms to Iran, North Korea, and Syria.

    There are also more pressing concerns that could arise if Turkey resists NATO’s request and continues to pursue Chinese missile technology.

    Members of Congress urged the Obama Administration to pressure Turkey to abandon its partnership with CPMIEC, expressing concern that China may exploit the system to strip classified data from NATO’s missile network.

    NATO defense officials have decried the Chinese system as a “virus” and have declared that such a system would be incompatible with existing NATO missile capabilities and thus degrade the effectiveness of NATO’s missile defense shield. NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has also warned Turkey that any procurement it makes must be compatible with current NATO systems.

    Turkish officials have claimed that the proposed system will be compatible with existing systems and that they are pursuing the Chinese bid because it is less expensive, has the potential to be co-produced, and allows for technology transfer—something of great importance to the development of Turkey’s defense industry.

    Choosing the system offered by CPMIEC cannot be considered good defense policy. Turkey needs a ballistic missile defense system, especially with the growing number of ballistic missile threats in the region, but potentially making the rest of NATO vulnerable to ballistic missile attack is not the solution.

    It is unclear if China is trying to drive a wedge between Turkey and NATO or Turkey and the U.S. or is attempting to diminish NATO’s effectiveness. If Turkey weighs the short-term gains associated with the Chinese bid versus the long-term gains associated with NATO compatibility and security, it would realize that choosing a system more compatible with NATO has the likelihood of producing greater benefit.

    Matthew Rolfes is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please click here.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.