• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The Fed’s Monetary Policy Matters, Too

    Newscom

    Newscom

    It’s easy to get distracted with news like the guessing game of who will replace Ben Bernanke. But the more important issue is: What is the U.S. doing with its monetary policy and why?

    What we’ve learned about monetary policy since the Fed was created is surely more important than any one Fed chairman candidate’s political problems, but the inner workings of monetary policy have never really been much of a party starter. Though understandable, this lack of interest is most troubling, especially in light of recent statements by Bernanke such as that “the maximum level of employment in a given economy is largely determined by nonmonetary factors.”

    Putting aside the very real question of the Fed’s policy effectiveness, the news has also been dominated by whether the Fed is cutting back (or “tapering”) its bond purchases too soon. Conventional thinking on monetary policy holds that tapering too soon will slow down the economy before the recovery really takes hold.

    To implement its discretionary monetary policy, the Fed essentially plays the game of trying to time economic activity. In other words, it tries to buy bonds to boost the economy (but not for too long) and then sell bonds to slow it down (but not too soon). Timing things wrong could send the economy into a recession or cause inflation.

    Although trying to time the economy this way might seem a bit odd, especially given comments like Bernanke’s, it really is the essence of an active monetary policy. Given the Fed’s recent track record in failing to predict a major financial crisis/recession, we should all start to pay a little more attention to monetary policy.

    In fact, maybe it’s time for Congress to formally review the Fed’s monetary policy. A great place to start would be Congressman Kevin Brady’s (R–TX) Centennial Monetary Commission Act of 2013 (H.R. 1176). This bipartisan bill has 25 cosponsors and would simply “establish a commission to examine the United States monetary policy, evaluate alternative monetary regimes, and recommend a course for monetary policy going forward.” Maybe Bernanke would like to sit on the commission?

    Posted in Economics, Front Page [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×