• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Why DOE Is Wasting $45 Million of Your Money

    DOE Secretary Ernest J. Moniz (Rick Friedman/Polaris/Newscom)

    DOE Secretary Ernest J. Moniz (Rick Friedman/Polaris/Newscom)

    Last week we wrote about the Department of Energy (DOE) wastefully spending $45 million in taxpayer dollars on advanced transportation technologies. The federal government spending taxpayer dollars on activities the private sector should be financing is nothing new, but another big part of the problem is that these investments stem from unnecessary government regulations in the first place—namely, fuel efficiency standards.

    Last year the Obama Administration finalized corporate average fuel economy standards for cars and light-duty trucks. The new rule requires an average fuel economy of 54.5 miles per gallon for 2025 model year vehicles. Not only will these new regulations drive the upfront cost of vehicles and restrict consumer choice, but they are going to be difficult for auto manufacturers to meet. Sales of electric vehicles are low, and lighter weight materials in vehicles increase costs.

    So, to assuage the concerns of auto manufacturers, the government is throwing money at different technologies such as advanced batteries, lightweight materials, and more fuel efficient air conditioning systems.

    For American consumers and taxpayers, it’s one Washington-created problem trying to fix another: Restrict your product choice with stringent regulations, and then spend your money to help these companies meet these regulations.

    The latest $45 million in DOE spending and fuel efficiency standards ignore the fact that auto manufacturers, not the federal government, are much better equipped to meet the demands of consumers and the federal government. A better solution is to remove the government’s ability to tighten fuel efficiency standards, which would remove the need for the government to spend taxpayer dollars trying to push technologies through the market.

    There is nothing wrong with more hybrids, electric vehicles, or other alternative vehicle technologies making their way to the market. A diverse fuel supply will drive competition, but only when that process is driven by the market will it make consumers better off. If not, manufacturers may be forced to make a bunch of cars no one wants to buy, and America’s auto industry will be right back where it was a few years ago.

    Politicians want to dictate how our economy runs, and doing so costs us as taxpayers and consumers.

    Posted in Capitol Hill, Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.