• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Heritage Experts Discuss the Mess in Syria (VIDEO)

    In a 26-minute chat, Heritage experts discussed the unraveling situation in Syria and why President Obama’s widely publicized plan for limited missile strikes is not the best course of action for the United States.

    Having carelessly established a “red line” for intervening in the Syrian civil war without a clear strategy or appropriate course to protect U.S. interests, the President has now dumped the whole mess in the lap of Congress.

    Heritage’s Middle East expert Jim Phillips provided background on the Syrian civil war and the regional actors actively involved in propping up the Bashar al-Assad regime. According to Phillips, “Syria is Iran’s closest ally” and has a vested interested in keeping Assad in power.

    Steven Bucci, director of Heritage’s Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, explained that Heritage opposes using force in Syria because “the President’s plans will not help this particular situation.… [It] makes us feel better because we did something.”

    In terms of our national security interests, Bucci clarified that “it is not as scientific as it sounds—there is not a direct national security threat to the United States…allies, yes—but not to the U.S.”

    Charlotte Florance, a research associate in the Allison Center, highlighted the humanitarian dimensions of the Syrian civil war and the need to support U.S. friends and allies in the region. Florance pointed out that “currently there are over 2 million refugees living—dispersed between Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, and Iraq—Jordan carrying the brunt [of the refugee crisis].”

    The Heritage experts also discussed problems emanating from the fractious Syrian opposition. Phillips explained how some of the 1,200 rebel groups fighting in Syria have become publicly linked to al-Qaeda.

    Bucci pointed out how many of the challenges the U.S. faces in vetting the various rebel groups in Syria are the same challenges the U.S. faced in Iraq when it found difficulty separating the good groups from the bad and the ugly.

    Florance also explained how al-Qaeda-linked groups are building political support in Syria’s ungoverned region by providing goods and services to people in need.

    As Phillips pointed out, serious uncertainties remain about the President’s strategic aims with respect to the use of military force. Joint Chiefs chairman General Martin Dempsey was unable to articulate a political goal behind the use of force in Syria during a recent Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, a clear indication that the American people deserve a better plan than what the President is giving them.

    Posted in Capitol Hill, Featured, Front Page [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.