• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Zero Troops in Afghanistan: The Taliban Dream Option



    “The zero option is the Taliban dream option. An abrupt drawdown would pave the way for the Taliban to regain influence and cripple the U.S. ability to conduct counter-terrorism missions in the region,” Lisa Curtis of The Heritage Foundation stated in recent remarks at a conference on Afghanistan on Capitol Hill.

    Curtis was reacting to the recent announcement that the Obama Administration was considering leaving no troops in Afghanistan after 2014. This sends dangerous signals to the region about America’s staying power and commitment to continuing the fight against international terrorism.

    Michael O’Hanlon of the Brookings Institution, another participant in Tuesday’s conference, agreed that maintaining some kind of international troop presence post-2014 is essential to the stability of the Afghan state.

    Curtis noted that the U.S. should not repeat the same mistake it made nearly 20 years ago by disengaging abruptly from Afghanistan, especially when so much blood and treasure has been expended in the country over the past 11 years.

    “[T]he Afghans already believe the U.S. will cut and run, similar to the way we turned our backs on them over two decades ago when the Soviets left,” said Curtis.

    With 2014 fast approaching, it is vital that the U.S. be frank about the number of troops it intends to leave behind. In a recent report, Curtis noted:

    Former U.S. Central Command chief General James Mattis made clear in recent remarks to Congress that he hoped the U.S. would leave behind around 13,500 troops and that other NATO nations would leave an additional 6,500 troops. This would bring a total of around 20,000 international forces stationed in Afghanistan beyond 2014 to help with training and advising the Afghan forces.

    Without a clear post-2014 U.S. plan, the regional players will start hedging their bets, leading to increased instability and possibly even renewed civil war. On the other hand, if the U.S. handles the military transition from combat to a support role in Afghanistan carefully and responsibly, it will be possible to achieve a measure of stability in Afghanistan that will help protect core U.S. national security interests.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.