- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -
Keystone Pipeline: Shaheen–Portman Bill the Wrong Place for a Keystone Amendment
Posted By Katie Tubb On July 24, 2013 @ 7:59 pm In Energy | Comments Disabled
The Heritage Foundation has already made the case  that the Shaheen–Portman energy efficiency bill promises only more federal intervention and corporate welfare. Adding an amendment to approve the Keystone XL Pipeline project wouldn’t make the bill any better.
The Shaheen–Portman bill would set up a “voluntary” national building code that induces states into taking federal money and the strings that go with it to implement federal standards for homes and other buildings. It also makes states the middle man in a new Department of Energy (DOE) grant program for energy efficiency upgrades while expanding other channels of corporate welfare through the DOE’s Advanced Manufacturing Office. It also spends millions on worker training programs, which states, universities, and industry already supply when they find that the workforce doesn’t meet demand.
The reality is that businesses and individuals care about using energy wisely  even without the government’s prodding. Bringing government incentives, programs, and funding into the picture only brings inefficiency into the picture.
Adding an amendment calling the Obama Administration out on its unreasonable handling of the Keystone project won’t make the Shaheen–Portman bill itself any less unreasonable itself. The Senate has held several symbolic votes telling President Obama he has dragged his feet long enough on the Keystone XL Pipeline decision. In March, 62 Senators voted in favor  of Senator John Hoeven’s (R–ND) amendment to bypass the President’s role in the decision. The Senate rejected another amendment by Senator Barbara Boxer (D–CA) that called for more studies on the pipeline  by a vote of 66–33.
Including a Keystone Pipeline amendment would be a Pyrrhic victory, since it wouldn’t improve the bill. Congress should authorize  the construction of the Keystone Pipeline  but shouldn’t use it as a sweetener for an energy efficiency bill that is nothing more than corporate welfare and government paternalism.
Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2013/07/24/keystone-pipeline-shaheen-portman-bill-the-wrong-place-for-a-keystone-amendment/
URLs in this post:
 already made the case: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/06/the-shaheenportman-energy-efficiency-bill-a-costly-inefficient-use-of-taxpayer-money?ac=1
 care about using energy wisely: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/03/why-energy-efficiency-is-good-energy-efficiency-mandates-are-bad
 voted in favor: http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/290043-senate-dems-split-on-keystone-carbon-taxes
 more studies on the pipeline: http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/289941-senate-endorses-keystone-xl-through-budget-amendment
 Congress should authorize: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/01/keystone-pipeline-rejection-and-obamas-economic-recovery-plan
 the Keystone Pipeline: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/12/unnecessary-keystone-xl-pipeline-delay-obstructs-energy-jobs
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.