• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Keystone Pipeline: Shaheen–Portman Bill the Wrong Place for a Keystone Amendment

    The Heritage Foundation has already made the case that the Shaheen–Portman energy efficiency bill promises only more federal intervention and corporate welfare. Adding an amendment to approve the Keystone XL Pipeline project wouldn’t make the bill any better.

    The Shaheen–Portman bill would set up a “voluntary” national building code that induces states into taking federal money and the strings that go with it to implement federal standards for homes and other buildings. It also makes states the middle man in a new Department of Energy (DOE) grant program for energy efficiency upgrades while expanding other channels of corporate welfare through the DOE’s Advanced Manufacturing Office. It also spends millions on worker training programs, which states, universities, and industry already supply when they find that the workforce doesn’t meet demand.

    The reality is that businesses and individuals care about using energy wisely even without the government’s prodding. Bringing government incentives, programs, and funding into the picture only brings inefficiency into the picture.

    Adding an amendment calling the Obama Administration out on its unreasonable handling of the Keystone project won’t make the Shaheen–Portman bill itself any less unreasonable itself. The Senate has held several symbolic votes telling President Obama he has dragged his feet long enough on the Keystone XL Pipeline decision. In March, 62 Senators voted in favor of Senator John Hoeven’s (R–ND) amendment to bypass the President’s role in the decision. The Senate rejected another amendment by Senator Barbara Boxer (D–CA) that called for more studies on the pipeline by a vote of 66–33.

    Including a Keystone Pipeline amendment would be a Pyrrhic victory, since it wouldn’t improve the bill. Congress should authorize the construction of the Keystone Pipeline but shouldn’t use it as a sweetener for an energy efficiency bill that is nothing more than corporate welfare and government paternalism.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.