• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obamacare: AMA’s Curious Support



    In an interview with Bloomberg’s Bureau of National Affairs, Dr. Ardis Dee Hoven, incoming president of the American Medical Association (AMA), said the AMA will push for full implementation of Obamacare, including its Medicaid expansion:

    She said AMA continues to work on implementation issues with the states, and she called on physicians to work with their state agency representatives and elected officials to achieve ACA’s goals.

    If Obamacare’s goals were fully realized and every state expanded its Medicaid program, an additional 25 million Americans would be enrolled in the broken program by 2021.

    To be sure, Medicaid is consistently failing the population it is intended to serve, which makes the AMA’s support of expansion quite curious—especially given that Medicaid, on average, reimburses physicians only about 58 percent of what private insurance pays. Indeed, about one out of three doctors would not accept new Medicaid patients in 2011.

    And while Obamacare was supposed to increase primary care physicians’ Medicaid reimbursement for 2013 and 2014 to Medicare levels, thus far that has not happened, and it remains unclear when or if that policy will be implemented.

    Adding to the intrigue of AMA’s Medicaid expansion position is that it is simultaneously working to repeal Medicare’s scheduled physician payment cuts. Medicare on average pays physicians about 80 percent of what private insurance pays, and the sustainable growth rate (SGR) calls for about a 25 percent pay cut for doctors next year—potentially dropping Medicare’s payment slightly below Medicaid’s—which would severely hinder seniors’ ability to access care.

    While nearly no one thinks the SGR’s implementation is good policy, it is striking that even as the AMA fights against the lower payments the SGR mandates in Medicare, it is enthusiastic about having more patients in Medicaid, which pays even less in reimbursement.

    A Medicaid expansion would offer health coverage, but that is far different from patients being able to access health care. The severe access problem already existing in today’s Medicaid program (and getting worse under Obamacare) gives states and doctors yet another reason to reject a program expansion and hold out for patient-centered health care reform.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.