• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Morning Bell: Don't Take the Money and Run

    You may have heard that Obamacare’s main plan for getting people health insurance is to put them on Medicaid.

    Medicaid—which is supposed to be the federal-state partnership that serves low-income children, disabled Americans, pregnant women, and some seniors.

    Medicaid, which is not quality health care and is losing doctors every year.

    Medicaid, which is already so overloaded that the number of people on the program exceeds the population of France, Britain, or Italy.


    But Obamacare presents states with alluring federal money… and governors are under pressure to take the money and run.

    Unfortunately, giving in now doesn’t mean their financial pictures will be better later. Byron Schlomach, director of the Center for Economic Prosperity at the Goldwater Institute, lays out the scenario facing Arizona:

    This expansion would cost a lot of money we don’t have. Even with the federal government picking up most of the tab, estimates put the cost of expansion for Arizona at $125 million in 2016 alone. The yearly cost would rise as the federal share of the cost ratchets down to 90 percent. As the federal government’s financial condition worsens, states will likely have to pick up even more of the cost.

    Heritage research shows that 40 of 50 states would see increases in costs due the Medicaid expansion. It may look enticing at first because of the promise of federal money—but there is no guarantee that money will materialize down the line, Heritage experts have explained.

    >>> Share the Antidote to 10 Myths About Obamacare’s Medicaid Expansion

    Michigan is also divided on the decision—and in danger of buying into the myth that states could opt out of the expanded Medicaid program later if they don’t like it. As Jack McHugh, senior legislative analyst at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, puts it:

    If Michigan Republicans capitulate to special interests and accept the Obamacare Medicaid expansion, they’re likely to make a big deal about a supposed ‘opt-out’ clause in the instrument of surrender, declaring the state can bail at some future time if certain promises and expectations don’t come true. Don’t bet on it.

    There’s still time. And there are alternatives. States can stand up to Obamacare and do what’s in the best interest of their taxpayers and their uninsured residents.


    Obamacare’s Medicaid Trap

    Why the Obamacare Medicaid Expansion Is Bad for Taxpayers and Patients

    Read the Morning Bell and more en español every day at Heritage Libertad.

    Quick Hits:

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.