• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Syria: Obama Administration Slow-Walks Decision on Chemical Weapons

    The Obama Administration has been moving very slowly on the Syrian chemical weapons issue. Caution is in order, because the President’s credibility is on the line.

    President Obama has repeatedly warned Bashar al-Assad’s regime not to use its huge chemical weapons arsenal. In a December speech he proclaimed, “The use of chemical weapons [by the Assad regime] is and would be totally unacceptable. If you make the tragic mistake of using these weapons, there will be consequences and you will be held accountable.”

    Since then, as reports mounted that chemical weapons were being used, the President softened his position. The President also set a high bar for gathering evidence, mentioning that the U.S. had to establish a chain of custody for the evidence and that “I’ve got to make sure that I’ve got the facts.”

    The Obama Administration may be buying time to show that it gave diplomacy one last chance to succeed with Secretary of State John Kerry’s faltering attempts to convene a Syrian peace conference, which is doomed to failure as long as Assad believes he can win through the ruthless use of force.

    The President may also be stalling until he gets his new national security team in place. His new National Security Adviser, Susan Rice, and new ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, are expected to push for a more assertive policy regarding Syria. They were two of the three “Valkyries” who persuaded the President to reverse course and launch a military intervention in Libya in 2011.

    Now that the President has painted himself into a corner by announcing his red line on Syrian chemical weapons, it is clear that he must take action to enforce it. Otherwise, he risks undermining the credibility of his pledge to halt Iran’s nuclear weapons program.

    But a U.S. military intervention in Syria would be much more costly and risky than the Libyan intervention. Military operations to seize or destroy Syria’s chemical weapons could even make matters worse by leading Assad to conclude that he must use them or lose them.

    Regardless of what he ultimately decides to do, President Obama should step up efforts to cultivate allies within the opposition on the ground inside Syria. Non-Islamist opposition forces within the Free Syrian Army would be valuable allies in helping to monitor the disposition of Assad’s chemical weapons, track their movements, and help to destroy or seize them if necessary. Such allies could also help contain and combat al-Qaeda and its allies after the fall of Assad.

    See: Syria’s Chemical Weapons: U.S. Should Engage Syria’s Opposition to Defuse Threat.

    See also: Counter-Proliferation Contingency Planning Is Needed for Syrian WMD.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.