• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Harry Reid's Ploy to Plow Through the Farm Bill

    The U.S. Senate is expected to vote this morning on a measure that will effectively end debate on the misnamed “farm” bill, cutting off opportunities to fix the deeply flawed legislation.

    At a cost of a nearly $1 trillion — 80 percent of which goes to the food-stamp program — American taxpayers deserve a robust debate. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) won’t let that happen.

    This isn’t the first time Reid has pulled this stunt. His iron-fisted approach to running the Senate is one reason Americans hold Washington in such low regard and have a strong distrust of politicians. Reid’s obstructionist move marginalizes the opposition by refusing to allow amendments to be considered.

    By muzzling reformers, Reid is also demonstrating a blatant disregard for the Senate’s deliberative nature — one that should welcome an open and hearty debate on a 1,150-page bill that would cost taxpayers $955 billion. Reid’s sense of urgency isn’t too surprising, though, considering members of the Senate Agriculture Committee dispensed of the bill in a mere three hours.

    >>> SHARE THIS PICTURE: Facebook | Pinterest | Tumblr


    Reid’s need for speed certainly fits well into another problem plaguing Congress — a lack of transparency and accountability. By steamrolling the process, Reid is hoping to avoid problems rampant in the bill itself. For example, in its current form, the bill allows the food-stamp program to continue along as if its costs had not skyrocketed. The legislation also contains new and expensive farm programs that would attempt to eliminate almost all risk for farmers — even minor losses would be covered courtesy of taxpayers.

    Reformers have ideas for fixing this behemoth of a bill.

    Senators should start by stripping the food-stamp program from the bill, and then move on to reforming farm policy by proposing a real “farm” bill. By making this change, both issues would get the proper attention they deserve. There’s no sound policy reason for these two distinct issues, food stamps and farming, to be combined into one massive bill. Of course, farm bill proponents know this all too well. Senator Thad Cochran (R-MS) admitted: “[Food stamps] should continue to be included purely from a political perspective. It helps get the farm bill passed.”

    >>> LEARN MORE: 10 Things You Should Know About the Farm Bill

    Until Congress addresses the two issues separately, lawmakers should realize that “fully informed discussion, let alone necessary reform, is all but impossible when the food-stamp program is carried under the banner of a farm bill,” as Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) and Heritage Action CEO Michael Needham explained in a National Review op-ed.

    But none of this can occur if Reid succeeds in slamming the door. And if that door closes this morning, it’s just another example of Washington politicians ignoring our staggering $17 trillion debt and choosing special interests over taxpayers’ best interests.

    Quick Hits:

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.