• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Immigration: Senate’s Amnesty Would Cost Trillions

    Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA/Newscom

    Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA/Newscom

    In 2007, The Heritage Foundation estimated that amnesty would cost the U.S. taxpayer trillions of dollars over the lifetimes of the immigrants who are legalized. We will soon release an updated analysis. It is a resounding rebuttal to the claim from amnesty supporters that a long waiting period between the initial amnesty and citizenship will eliminate any major costs to taxpayers.

    S. 744, the comprehensive immigration reform supported by the “Gang of Eight,” would grant amnesty within six months to nearly all illegal immigrants living in the U.S. as of 2011. However, an individual receiving amnesty would have to wait 10 years before becoming a legal permanent resident (a “green card” holder) and three more years before becoming a naturalized citizen. This window of ineligibility for many government services has led supporters to argue that an amnesty will not be costly.

    There are two problems with this argument. First, households headed by illegal immigrants today consume some government services and pay far less in taxes. Under current law, such households already run a net fiscal deficit. During the provisional status, the deficit would go down slightly as legalized individuals begin paying more taxes. But note that illegal households cost taxpayers money even before full permanent residency is achieved.

    The second problem with the view that amnesty would not be costly because of the waiting period is rather obvious: After the waiting period is over, lifetime costs will be substantial. The Heritage Foundation analysis has and will explicitly separate its cost estimates among current law, the provisional period, and after individuals receiving amnesty become eligible for the full suite of government benefits. The estimates for the final period in our research will be calculated beginning 14 years after the initial amnesty, which is the point at which recipients could become naturalized citizens. During this final period, the net fiscal deficit experienced by illegal households would be enormous. It is myopic to view the cost of amnesty over only a 10-year window when individuals receiving amnesty are eligible to stay for life.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×