• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama’s Missile Defense Policy Reversal: Better Late Than Never

    Lockheed Martin/Newscom

    The Obama Administration’s decision to reinstate 14 ground-based interceptors (GBIs)—which it reduced in its first term—is a necessary but not sufficient response to the North Korean ballistic missile threat.

    North Korea’s ballistic missile testing and bellicose rhetoric prompted the Administration to augment the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) program. This decision reverses one of several of the Administration’s reductions in U.S. missile defense.

    The Obama Administration has cancelled some of the most promising missile defense programs, including the Multiple Kill Vehicle, Kinetic Energy Interceptor, or Airborne Laser. In 2009, Obama cancelled the Bush Administration plan to deploy missile defenses to Poland and the Czech Republic, which would have protected the U.S. and its allies from Iranian ballistic missiles.

    Reinstatement of the GBIs is welcome news, but it should prompt the Administration to rethink all of its missile defense reductions.

    While a focus on improving missile defense capabilities is essential, it should be balanced with future development of a comprehensive, layered missile defense program. Just last week, General Charles Jacoby, commander of Northern Command, stated at a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee that U.S. capabilities should increase, because Iran is “developing its capability faster than originally assessed.” General Robert Kehler, commander of U.S. Strategic Command, also recently testified before the House Armed Services Committee that “under current levels of capability, the U.S. missile defense system is sufficient only against a limited strike.”

    The President reduced funding for the missile defense program by billions since taking office, yet ballistic missile capabilities continue to expand worldwide. It is essential that the United States advance a comprehensive, layered ballistic missile defense program.

    Jordan Harms is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please click here.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.