• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Making the Case for Marriage

    Newscom

    As the Supreme Court prepares to hear cases involving California’s Proposition 8 and the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in late March, a new report by Heritage’s Ryan T. Anderson helps focus on the central issues in the ongoing marriage debate. Anderson writes:

    Marriage exists to bring a man and a woman together as husband and wife to be father and mother to any children their union produces. It is based on the anthropological truth that men and women are different and complementary, the biological fact that reproduction depends on a man and a woman, and the social reality that children need both a mother and a father.

    As a matter of public policy:

    Government recognizes marriage because it is an institution that benefits society in a way that no relationship does.… Marriage is thus a personal relationship that serves a public purpose in a political community.

    Anderson articulates how marriage serves the cause of limited government:

    Marriage is society’s least restrictive means of ensuring the well-being of children. Marital breakdown weakens society and limited government.… Marital breakdown costs taxpayers.

    Finally, the consequences of redefining marriage, while appearing to be few, are many and far-reaching. Redefining marriage would put into law the principle that marriage is whatever emotional bond the government says it is. As Anderson writes, nothing about an emotional union requires it to be limited to only two persons—or for it to be exclusive or permanent, for that matter.

    Anderson also stresses the effects of redefining marriage and its conflict with religious liberty:

    Redefining marriage marginalizes those with traditional views and leads to the erosion of religious liberty. The law and culture will seek to eradicate such views through economic, social, and legal pressure. If marriage is redefined, believing what virtually every human society once believed about marriage—a union of a man and woman ordered to procreation and family life—would be seen increasingly as a malicious prejudice to be driven to the margins of culture.

    The debate on marriage in America has just begun, and Anderson’s report shows the imprudence of redefining society’s most fundamental institution.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×