• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Small Business Administration: No Room for Sequestration Cuts?

    Smith/MCT/Newscom

    The White House warns that sequestration “would reduce loan guarantees to small businesses by up to $902 million”—loans that it claims are “investments that are helping grow our economy.” Setting this flawed Keynesian line of thinking aside, it’s worth investigating whether or not there is room to reduce spending at the Small Business Administration (SBA), which issues these loans.

    No surprise, there is. The Waste Book 2012, from the office of Senator Tom Coburn (R–OK), found that cupcake shop owners across the country received $2 million in SBA loans in 2012. While these cupcakes may be delicious, propping up such small businesses with federal tax dollars is not a proper, much less critical, function of the federal government.

    Access to capital is crucial for starting a small business, but private banks and venture capitalist firms—not the federal government acting as a bank—should be in the business of giving loans to entrepreneurs. They allocate capital more efficiently than the federal government, and they don’t leave taxpayers on the hook should a company fail. Taxpayers have seen Exhibits A through Z of what happens when the federal government picks winners and losers, in the slew of failed green energy companies that were financed with their tax dollars.

    The Government Accountability Office has also identified waste at the SBA. It noted that the SBA is one of four federal agencies that run 80 economic development programs. Translation: significant overlap, duplication, and wasteful spending.

    The Heritage Foundation has explained how the SBA “unnecessarily intervenes in free markets,” and thus should be eliminated entirely. Alternatively, Senator Coburn outlined in a 2011 report on budget reforms several ideas to programmatically reform the SBA that could save taxpayers several billion dollars over a decade.

    Lawmakers should not force taxpayers to financially back small businesses through the SBA. Instead, they should allow the private sector to fulfill this role entirely—as it will if Washington would stop its overburdening meddling— while they focus on more pressing matters, such as cutting spending and reforming entitlements, to put the country on a path to balancing the budget in 10 years.

    Christian McNally is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please click here.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×