• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Flawed Violence Against Women Act Could Become Next Lame-Duck Fight

    As the lame-duck session of Congress grinds to a close, policymakers are feeling the pressure to rush passage of a number of expansive, potentially faulty pieces of legislation before the year’s end. Recent rumors swirling around Washington suggest the House may consider anew language in a Senate-passed version of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) reauthorization in the next few weeks.

    Despite the original law’s good intentions to support female victims of violence, recent reauthorizations—including those before Congress—are seriously flawed and have steered the law away from its original intent of protecting vulnerable women.

    As Heritage research fellow David Muhlhausen and Independent Women’s Forum visiting fellow Christina Villegas explain in a Heritage Backgrounder, the problems with the VAWA reauthorization are numerous and go well beyond the legislation’s surrender of American rights to tribal courts. The Senate-passed language engages in “mission creep” by broadening the classes of covered victims to include men and prisoners, expands already duplicative programs, and fails to authorize much-needed accountability measures—all the while increasing direct federal spending by more than $100 million.

    Investigations conducted by the Department of Justice earlier this year reveal instances of fraud with some Office of Violence Against Women grants and bring into question the efficacy of programs purported to assist vulnerable women. Unallowable grant expenditures, embezzlement of federal funds, and the questionable use of nearly $1 million in Office of Violence Against Women grants in one service area should be reason enough for Congress to require more oversight of federal dollars.

    Yet, the most recent VAWA reauthorization before Congress fails to demand robust accountability measures for a law the Congressional Budget Office estimates will cost taxpayers $660 million from 2012 to 2016. As Muhlhausen and Villegas explain:

    Nationally representative, scientifically rigorous impact evaluations should be used to determine whether these national grant programs actually produce their intended effects. Obviously, there is little merit in the continuation of programs that fail to ameliorate the social problems they target.

    Instead, the Senate reauthorization of VAWA blindly expands the scope of the existing law and increases already duplicative programs, enabling the federal government to usurp more power over violence reduction efforts—work that is already taking place in local and state governments with greater success.

    “Using federal agencies and grant programs to fund the routine operations of domestic violence programs that state and local governments themselves could provide is a misuse of federal resources and a distraction from concerns that truly are the province of the federal government,” Muhlhausen and Villegas explain. “Simply expanding this framework with extensive new provisions and programs that have been inadequately assessed is likely to facilitate waste, fraud, and abuse and will not better protect women or victims of violence generally.”

    All victims of violence, including women, deserve adequate support and robust defense. But good intentions alone cannot fix the substantive problems with the VAWA reauthorization and will not bring the most effective, efficient protection to vulnerable women. Policymakers should demand robust evaluations of existing federal VAWA programs, reduce duplicative programs, and acknowledge that state and local governments are better equipped to effectively and efficiently address violent crimes.

    Posted in Culture [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Flawed Violence Against Women Act Could Become Next Lame-Duck Fight

    1. Bobbie says:

      seems this government is supportive of violence and against women and will protect the male perpetrator over the female victim just like Muslims. No time needed taking, no money needed spending, Nothing had to change to reduce safety. For this administration to turn something commendable into something foreign, compromising the safety of the weaker sex is so beyond pathetic, but treason just the same and treason is forbidden in America! This administration is targeting areas of people and laws they don't like to protect the unwillingness of their foreign favorites from using their God given humanity to live by. America is suppose to be protected from foreign laws permeating America's civility, but America is under the attack by this administrations ignorance compromising protection law while they play dumb to civility feeding themselves handsomely off the people/America they're working against..

      • Bobbie says:

        for anyone to thumbs down without a reason must be those weak and pathetic types of men that lose all sense of control when they see female skin. Pampered insecurities make weaklings alright to force acceptance on everyone else, as the filth of humanity.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.