• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Responses to Union Suggestion of a Teacher "Bar Exam"

    Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), proposed a “bar exam” for public-school teachers in a Wall Street Journal op-ed last week.

    Modeled after the bar exam for aspiring lawyers, the new test would be intended to produce highly effective teachers. But it would do nothing of the kind.

    As we have explained before, passing a certification test has no impact on a teacher’s effectiveness. These tests are just barriers to entry that would discourage high-quality people from entering the profession in the first place. Existing teachers stand to benefit from these barriers, since they would limit competition and potentially push up wages, but students and taxpayers would certainly not benefit.

    A number of WSJ readers saw the problems with Weingarten’s proposal and sent several excellent letters in response. What follows is a sampling of those letters edited to emphasize the best parts. To read all of the letters in full, click here.

    The proposal by Randi Weingarten to ratchet up the credentialing and licensing requirements of teachers by instituting a bar exam for teachers is a colossally bad idea. As has been demonstrated time and again, there is no evidence that teacher credentialing increases student achievement. What the evidence suggests is that teacher-certification requirements actually drive potentially good teachers, especially individuals with advanced subject-matter knowledge, out of the teaching market.

    Tim Keller
    Institute for Justice
    Tempe, Arizona

    The president of the American Federation of Teachers tells us that there are too many unqualified teachers and that we should impose the equivalent of a “bar exam” for new K-12 teachers. So, the first thing we do is grandfather in the problems (oddly enough, this proposal doesn’t apply to existing teachers). Creating hurdles to teaching reduces supply, and if demand is the same, it raises costs to the school district and thus tends to push up the pay of the existing teachers. Not surprising that a union leader is proposing to set up additional barriers to entry.

    Professor Ronald D. Rotunda
    Chapman University
    Orange, California

    Randi Weingarten overlooks the predominant difference between the teaching (union) and legal (nonunion) professions: individual responsibility. When lawyers don’t meet employer or client expectations, their employers and clients are free to terminate their relationships. There are no grievance processes standing in the way. Nor do lawyers who excel at their jobs go on strike and refuse to work, march through our cities and towns demanding more money and more time off, or advocate for more protections for their underperforming counterparts.

    Scott Emery
    New York

    Is this the same Randi Weingarten of the AFT who opposed using standardized test scores as part of a teacher-evaluation system in Chicago but now wants to implement a standardized test system for a teachers’ “bar exam”?

    Tom Van Kleef
    Fort Worth, Texas

    I wonder if along with a bar exam there will be a law banning practicing education without a license. Home-schoolers will love that one.

    M. R. Gedge
    Hamden, Connecticut

    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Responses to Union Suggestion of a Teacher "Bar Exam"

    1. Bobbie says:

      Unions have no right to involve themselves with the merits of teaching and the qualifications of teachers, That is rightly between the parents and the teachers and the public school board without a bias. Unions do not benefit any education of the student. They use the students to exploit for their and their members benefits. Unions are there for their members making unions a conflict of interest. Don't validate any proposal from them They shouldn't have the power and all they've been doing is lessening the bar in education!.

    2. j.e. kaelin m.d. says:

      i find it interesting that many teachers object to passing an exam to teach our children. i practiced medicine for 30 plus years as a surgeon and i can assure you that i had to pass a state licensing exam and board certifying exam before i could hang up my shingle. is teaching our youngsters any less serious??

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.