• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • How Sequestration Budget Cuts Could Affect U.K. Defense

    If sequestration becomes a reality in January 2013, the Department of Defense (DOD) will cut another $500 billion from an already slashed defense budget. These cuts are likely to negatively affect many American allies—especially the United Kingdom.

    Here are two programs that London should watch carefully:

    1. The Short Take Off and Vertical Landing (STOVL) version of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). Defense Secretary Leon Panetta indicated that the DOD could not afford to exempt major programs from defense cuts resulting from sequestration—specifically mentioning the JSF. Furthermore, a House Armed Services Committee report published last year stated that sequestration meant the “likely elimination of the STOVL variant of the JSF.”

    The Royal Navy depends on the survival of this program, and its on-time delivery, in order to reintroduce its carrier strike capability in 2020. The British government scrapped plans to install catapults and arrester gear on its new carriers when cost estimates increased from £350 million to £2 billion in less than 12 months. Consequently, with the whole Harrier fleet now decommissioned, the U.K. will not have a carrier strike capability without the STOVL variant of the JSF. Clearly, sequestration puts this at risk.

    2. The Ohio-class replacement submarine—especially the development of the Common Missile Compartment that is critical for the next generation of the U.K.’s nuclear deterrent. As part of Obama’s initial defense cuts, the in-service date of the Ohio-class replacement was delayed by two years. It is too early to tell if the delay will impact on the timely delivery of the Common Missile Compartment.

    In addition, nobody knows what sort of impact sequestration could have on the program. Unlike the STOVL variant of the JSF, there is no threat of a total cancellation. However, the concern for the U.K. is with any further delays to the program, which could impact the future development of the U.K.’s own nuclear deterrent replacement.

    In Britain, before the Conservative Party entered office, nobody would have imagined that the U.K. would end up cutting its sole aircraft carrier, its whole Harrier fleet, 40 percent of its main battle tanks, and 20,000 soldiers—all in the name of deficit reduction. Everyone wants to believe that his own program is safe from cuts, but the truth is that nobody knows what will happen. London should be prepared for the worst-case scenario.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to How Sequestration Budget Cuts Could Affect U.K. Defense

    1. Don S says:

      Why is American money so important to the national defence of our friends of other nations.

    2. Meister says:

      It is thanks to the last Labour government that UK defence has been left in this mess. They hollowed out existing capabilities and at the same time wasted billions on ill-conceived, poorly managed projects like the CVF+F35B. It is a pity that this project could not have been cancelled outright and the money spent on 3 x 30,000 ton CVH and more destroyers/frigates. Utterley shambolic stewardship of defence under Blair and Brown.

    3. Afnan Shah says:

      Is Luke Coffey ignorant or playing tricks? DOD will cut another $500 billion in next 10 YEARS …

      He conveniently forgot to mention 10 years.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×