• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Your Opinion Needed for the State Department

    The State Department wants your opinion. No, not on weighty matters like the Arab Spring/Winter, relations with Russia, the state of NATO, or Chinese free-trade violations. The pressing question of the day is whether it should rename its blog DipNote.

    To tell the truth, the options are not exactly mind-blowing, a reflection of State’s uneasy struggle to enter the flow of 21st-century communication, and a bit of a waste of time.

    On Friday, December 7, State issued an invitation for crowd-sourcing possible alternatives. A list of four final choices has been chosen from the names submitted by 370 State Department employees worldwide:

    • Unclassified: The State Department Blog
    • Statecraft
    • Matters of State
    • (And, yes) DipNote

    Perhaps the selection reflects the less-than-free-flowing style of Foggy Bottom. In any event, those who feel like voting should click here. The naming competition is part of a redesign that allegedly will “include greater functionality and interactivity with an emphasis on visual engagement.” Nothing wrong with engagement, but do all those diplomats not have anything better to do than thinking up blog names?

    In other news, the State Department is grappling with procedures for public diplomacy in the world of instant communication. Proposed new guidelines for approval of blogs, tweets, and other written communication are in the works, an apparent effort to tighten control.

    Supervisors are to have two days to review tweets and five days for blog posts, speeches, or prepared remarks. Articles or books would be subject to a 30-day review period. Needless to say, two days is an eternity in social media terms, and would restrict the potential for officials to engage in free-flowing debates.

    The procedural review was undoubtedly influenced in part by the debacle over the tweets from the Cairo U.S. embassy staff as they were attacked on September 11. It may also have been occasioned by a recent book, a scathing indictment of U.S. public diplomacy in Iraq, We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the People of Iraq, authored by former State Department employee Peter van Buren. State has not been pleased.

    Social media is an important part of U.S. public diplomacy today. State’s social media outreach has expanded exponentially, as recently described by Under Secretary of State Tara Sonenshine at The Heritage Foundation on December 3. Embassies now have their own Facebook pages and Twitter feeds, and the Bureau of International Information Programs (IIP) has four major Facebook properties to engage foreign audiences. In just 15 months, State’s own Facebook page following has expanded from 800,000 to more than 8 million, including young people in Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Pakistan, and Venezuela.

    At the same time, however, U.S. diplomacy around the world is experiencing serious challenges (the Middle East comes to mind), and American leadership has seen decline under the Obama Administration.

    The bottom line is this: Twitter and Facebook diplomacy cannot substitute for a serious global agenda, and may even be viewed as the Internet equivalent of fiddling while traditional U.S. diplomacy burns.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Your Opinion Needed for the State Department

    1. Bobbie says:

      keep dip and change note to something more reflective to what it is…

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×