• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • U.S. to U.N. Conference: Hands Off the Internet

    Regulating the Internet is a dream of autocratic governments and international organizations alike. This week and next, Internet governance will be the hot topic of the World Conference on International Telecommunications.

    The conference began on December 3 in Dubai and is hosted by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), a U.N. organization. The conference is experiencing tension from the outset between those who support Internet freedom and those who believe that the ITU should be the Internet’s global governing body.

    The event, which hosts 193 countries, marks “the first time [the ITU] has overseen a major overhaul of telecommunication regulations since 1988.” The 12-day conference and its nearly 1,500 delegates—including representatives from national governments, industry experts, and civil society advocates—is virtually split into two groups.

    One group is comprised of those who want to see the private California-based Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) limited in its global powers. (ICANN’s main function is to issue domain names.) Countries of this mindset are expected to advocate for ITU to take over global Internet governance.

    The opposing group—which includes the U.S., the European Union, Canada, and firms such as Google—oppose the new proposed ITU Internet regulation, saying it would inevitably threaten an open and globally connected Internet. Terry Kramer, head of the U.S.delegation to the conference, has said that the proposals that the ITU should enter the Internet governance business “fundamentally violate everything we believe in terms of democracy and opportunities for individuals, and we’re going to vigorously oppose any proposals of that nature.”

    The U.S. and EU are up against proposals such as that submitted by Russia, which argues that member states should have “equal rights to manage the Internet”—a devastating move toward more censorship if accepted. The Internet has become a powerful tool for individual expression in open and even closed societies. That advance should be protected.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to U.S. to U.N. Conference: Hands Off the Internet

    1. Bobbie says:

      it's ridiculous to suggest member states should have “equal rights to manage the Internet??!!" Underhanded when we're not equally inclined to it's purpose. What's the purpose for the global governing that isn't threats to protect governing deviance?

      Get the un off the world's back. They're not trustworthy and fulfill no productive or protective purpose in favor of people's freedom and liberty. They also use people offended by freedom to legislate laws of offense!

      The U.N. and all affiliates are untrustworthy by their own doing, now a conflict of interest and people can toughen up to get over their petty offenses easily tolerated and/or ignored. Human endurance grows when those offended rise above like people do for themselves to appreciate respect for each other and freedom!
      Human weakness grows when government wants to govern it!!!!!

    2. Ryan says:

      All of these governments can pass whatever they want to, they still will not control something they clearly have no understanding of. You aren't going to put a 5 year old in charge of all 747s in an airport. Therefore you aren't going to have clueless old fogey power mongers have control of the internet.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×