• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Chart of the Week: Obama’s Fiscal Cliff Plan Has $4 of Tax Hikes to $1 of Cuts

    In one of heaven’s sweeter ironies, President Obama today launched the defense of his fiscal cliff proposal at a factory that makes…tinker toys. The setting perfectly reflected the Administration’s level of seriousness about the budget.

    The “plan,” presented to Republican leaders yesterday, consists of $1.6 trillion in tax hikes over 10 years and unspecified spending cuts that “could total” $400 billion over the same period. So estimating liberally, the package consists of at least $4 of tax increases to $1 of spending cuts—and that’s if the promised spending reductions do materialize (which is far from certain). This is the Obama definition of “a balanced plan.”

    It gets better. Even before these phantom savings come in, the President starts spending them: $25 billion to extend Medicare physicians’ payments and another $30 billion for extended unemployment insurance—both of which are part of the fiscal cliff. He also wants $50 billion for more economic “stimulus” (how’s that been working out so far?) and an unnamed amount for new mortgage refinancing relief.

    Put simply: Spend now, save later.

    About all of this, a few points:

    First, the emphasis on tax hikes first is totally misguided—and has been from the beginning. The main driver of government deficits and debt is spending. Spending is how government does what it does. It is the root cause of all other fiscal consequences and the reason government taxes and borrows. Therefore, controlling spending is the key to controlling the budget. Spending restraint should be the focus of these negotiations.

    Second, controlling spending requires restructuring government entitlements—especially Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. Obama and his allies refuse to face this fact, preferring to demagogue those who would “slash” these programs. The best way to ensure such cuts, however, is to leave these programs alone; they will collapse under their own weight.

    Third, the task at hand is the “fiscal cliff”—the $500 billion in tax increases and $110 billion in across-the-board spending cuts (sequestration) scheduled to start in January 2013. In the few weeks left till the New Year, Congress and the President should attend to those issues and leave the rest for next year, under regular budget procedures.

    As it happens, way back in May, House Republicans adopted a plan to avoid the cliff, though they seem too modest these days to discuss it. Their package—written in legislative language and accompanied by formal estimates from the Congressional Budget Office—replaced the crude sequestration mechanism with specific policy reforms, including Medicaid and food stamps. It would have prevented the current crisis and also placed a down payment on needed entitlement reform. It could have formed a reasonable starting point for negotiations (and still could).

    The President and the Senate, however, simply ignored the proposal while offering no alternative of their own—exercising passive-aggressive neglect of their fiscal responsibilities.

    There is still time to fix the current dilemma, but time is running short. There are “Six Bipartisan Entitlement Reforms to Solve the Real Fiscal Crisis”—the President only needs to seize the moment and lead. If, instead, the President and his allies continue their frivolous tactics, they will provide a whole new definition of the term “lame-duck session.”

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Chart of the Week: Obama’s Fiscal Cliff Plan Has $4 of Tax Hikes to $1 of Cuts

    1. ROBERT SWANSON says:

      The Presidents position on this matter only reflects his true intentions and complete misunderstanding of the seriousness of the national debt. With his proposal entertaining serious discussion with Obama is ludicrous. If the United States goes into the crisis mode where major cuts in all areas where government spending is thrust into effect, it may be the only way to bring about a compromise.
      Obama has always governed (not lead) by a position of strength. Take that strength away and he will cave in.

    2. Elmer Hunt says:

      I thought he was only raising taxes on the wealthy . Where are they going to get they other 600 billion ? Look in the mirror .

    3. Michael says:

      I'd like to see a breakdown of the supposed increase in taxes.

    4. @sedj4wd says:

      How can they talk on a budget w/o immigration & our Borders go unprotected ? within a week 7 People have been arrested in different states of terrorism acts . The fraud within the entitlement programs ? Now we have a President that left 4 men to be Murdered and with live surveillance seen back to the WH and Stand down orders when General Ham requesting help ? And then for President and Hillary in front of the Family's with there Sons Body"s in caskets telling the Family's they would make sure the Film maker is punished . A Solders Code is to never leave a man standing alone were goes one goes us all . President Obama decreased and disrespected our Military Men .

    5. Lloyd Scallan says:

      This Marxist "president" is leading alright, leading us into economic collapse. The real question is, are the established Republicans (the same bunch that gave us Dole, McCain, and Romney) that stupid to fall for this Democrat lie again? How many time does this inept political party stab the American people in the back by accepting any offer of "spending cuts in the future for tax hikes today" from the communist/socialist that now infect the Democrat Party? Wake up America, this Republican Party is working hand in glove with the Dems to destroy America as we have known it.

    6. Fedupaj says:

      If the Republicans turn on the people that elected them and give in to Obama then they are no better than he is. I would prefer the so called "fiscal cliff" to Obama's plan, that way ALL the people can realize what their politicians have done to them and don't just pass it off to a chosen few. People are so in favor of taxing the hell out of the "other guy". Let everybody taste the bitterness and maybe they will start electing responsible people to represent them instead of the self-servers we have. Lets bite the bullet and get it overwith.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.