• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Prevention of Airline Carbon Taxes Should Be a Model for Carbon Regulations

    President Obama recently signed legislation that prevents the European Union (EU) from taxing U.S. airline emissions for planes that travel to and from EU countries.

    Although the EU announced it would delay the tax from its broader cap-and-trade-like system for a year, the new law protects U.S. airlines from the tax unless the International Civil Aviation Organization reaches a global agreement.

    Congress and President Obama deserve kudos for protecting American air carriers and consumers from the EU’s attempt to unilaterally impose a tax on Americans. Now they should step up to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from doing the same thing.

    When President Obama signed the bill, Senator Claire McCaskill (D–MO) remarked, “I’m happy for American consumers, who are the real winners here. It never made a bit of sense for European governments to tax our citizens for flying over our own airspace—and with the passage of this law we’ve got the tools we need to prevent it from happening and protect American jobs.”

    The executive branch should carry the same logic to our own borders. Despite Congress’s rejection of domestic cap-and-trade schemes, the EPA is unilaterally imposing regulations on carbon dioxide (CO2)—a colorless, odorless, and non-toxic gas.

    As McCaskill pointed out regarding the EU CO2 tax, the real losers in the EPA’s greenhouse gas regulations are the American consumers. These regulations will act as a massive energy tax, since a large majority of our energy comes from carbon-emitting fossil fuels.

    Regulations and more stringent fuel efficiency standards first target electric utilities, heavy industry, and the automotive industry—all in the name of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. But this will cause producers to pass those additional costs on to consumers and to constrict investments and business ventures.

    Follow the logic: If preventing EU-levied taxes protects American jobs, allowing the EPA to levy an energy tax through its regulatory assault will destroy American jobs.

    Even worse, the EPA’s greenhouse gas regulations will have no discernable environmental impact. Indeed, by restricting economic growth, Americans will actually have fewer resources to dedicate to environmental improvement.

    The regulations will not help to reduce global emissions, either. Both developed and developing countries have grand plans to build more affordable and reliable coal-fired power plants. In fact, the World Resources Institute projects that “1,199 new coal-fired plants, with a total installed capacity of 1,401,278 megawatts (MW), are being proposed globally. These projects are spread across 59 countries. China and India together account for 76 percent of the proposed new coal power capacities.”

    Congress and the Obama Administration served American airline companies and consumers well by preventing the EU from levying an unnecessary, unilateral tax. Congress should continue that momentum and prohibit the EPA and other agencies from regulating greenhouse gas emissions and unilaterally imposing a massive energy tax on the American people.

    Posted in Energy, Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Prevention of Airline Carbon Taxes Should Be a Model for Carbon Regulations

    1. Bobbie says:

      Clap Clap for the unusual showing of what appears to be American leadership. But America isn't fooled by your show. Get rid of the EPA. They did not create the earth! They do not know nature's course! Their only mentality is what they learn normal to man! They use stipulations to suggest they're protection of mother earth? That's ridiculous AMERICA! The earth provides us resources TO USE! The EPA provides con jobs at high costs! Money in the hands of the government or any of their entities is NOT GOING TO "CHANGE" or save us from NATURE'S COURSE!!!! Time to MOVE AHEAD! KICK the unreasonable, the irrational, the mipractical off America's path!!

    2. huynhhai says:

      good

    3. rmgdnnow says:

      I look and see that the worst of the global "polluters" (China and India) are ignored by the zealous regulators, while the U.S. and other industrially advanced nations are hit, although the latter are, as mentioned, better able and motivated to improve technology for reducing CO2 . Oh yes, as mentioned, CO2 is NOT a dangerous pollutant, rather an indispensable atmospheric factor for ALL plant life, which is indispensable to all animal life (including us). There is no scientific evidence I know of that doesn't suggest that MORE CO2 will make plants more efficient and productive for the benefit of all animal life. SO—what are the real reasons for all the hullabaloo about CO2 being a peril???

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×