• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • After the Hurricane, a Supply Crisis from Price Controls

    In the wake of the devastation wrought by Hurricane Sandy, storm victims are also suffering from a New Jersey state law that prohibits businesses from raising their prices more than 10 percent “within 30 days of a declared state of emergency.”

    Despite the intentions of New Jersey legislators, laws intended to prevent so-called “price gouging” do more harm than good. Imposing price ceilings on scarce goods punishes those whom it is intended to help: the victims of natural disasters such as Sandy.

    Laws against “price gouging” further diminish the supply of scarce goods. Disasters lead to a natural increase in the price of goods as their supplies shrink. This natural price increase encourages consumers to economize in their purchase of goods and thereby leave more for those who value these goods most. This economical use of goods helps prevent situations such as the one experienced by Shauron Sears, a 37-year-old waitress who waited in line for over 12 hours only to discover a manager shouting “No more gas!” just as she reached the front of the line.

    Artificial price ceilings discourage suppliers from relieving scarcity of goods. If, for example, the price of gasoline were allowed to rise, suppliers would likely scramble to sell their product where it is most valued. And over time, as the supply of gas increased, its price would decrease.

    In fact, Michael Giberson of Texas Tech University cites a paper published in 2007 in the Journal of Competition Law and Economics in which the authors conclude that a proposed national price gouging law “would have increased total economic losses during Hurricane Katrina and Rita by nearly $2 billion.”

    The gas lines of the 1970s were also created by price controls—and are not remembered fondly as an exercise of legislative prudence.

    Price ceilings also encourage the creation of black markets. Enterprising individuals will invest their time waiting in line to buy gas and then resell it to those who are unable to or don’t want to wait in line. In this Reason Foundation video, one New Jersey hurricane victim notes that a 2.5 gallon container of gas can be resold for as much as $50:

    Experts from the left, right, and center agree: Anti-price-gouging laws are a very poor solution to supply shortages following disasters. The best thing for the government to do is to get out of the way and let private market forces function and provide relief.

    Michael Benoit is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to After the Hurricane, a Supply Crisis from Price Controls

    1. JimmyZ says:

      I live here (Central New Jersey) and am a conservative. While I agree with you 95% of the time, I see two challenges to this answer. First, the gas shortage was mainly caused by 50-70% of gas stations unable to pump (closed) due to no electrical power. Most of them did not have backup generators. So the gas was there, it was in the tanks, but could not be pumped. If you charged $15 a gallon the tanks would have been filled with $15 a gallon gas that remained in the ground. Second, you couldnt build more hotel rooms to meet the demand in a matter of days or weeks when they are needed. I abolsutely support free market supply side economics in normal conditions, but am hard pressed to argue against protecting victims against predatory actions in times of emergency.

    2. Travis says:

      This is absolutely, emphatically, without a doubt – brilliant.

    3. TexasTruebadour says:

      Jimmy, if you're right in saying that in this particular situation it was a lack of electricity that lead to shortages in gasoline distribution, price ceilings wouldn't have helped. If there's any way at all to get around this power outage – using backup generators, etc – enacting price ceilings only removes the incentive for the gas station owners to find that way. In other words, a gas station owner isn't going to try and find ways to continue to provide gas, ways which will cost him time and money, if he's only allowed to charge up to 10% more than he usually does on gasoline. If he can make a bigger profit, he's more likely to try and find a way to get gas to the people.

      Regarding hotel rooms, people can learn to economize. Instead of putting a family of four in two rooms for two, they can all squeeze into one room, leaving an extra hotel room for someone else. Comfortable? No. Tolerable? Certainly.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×