• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Post-Election, Refocusing on National Security

    According to research by Politico, interest in the impending automatic defense cuts took a dive leading up to the election. But as the post-election polling and punditry subside, American citizens are returning their focus to pressing matters such as the so-called fiscal cliff and sequestration.

    Yet on Capitol Hill—where these potential defense cuts are a daily topic of discussion—the government has not found a way to stop them. Moreover, the Obama Administration’s only actions on sequestration have been to try to quiet public concern over its consequences rather than prevent it from happening. Though he has offered legally questionable assurances on layoffs and contract terminations caused by sequestration, President Obama has not taken any legitimate steps to stop them.

    The Heritage Foundation and others have been warning about the effects of sequestration since its creation. Various Members of Congress have been taking the discussion to their districts around the country. Military leaders have been urging action to stop the cuts for over a year.

    Yet Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D–NV) have refused to accept any solution unless it includes tax increases. In addition, they have failed to propose credible solutions to reform the biggest driver of the national debt and largest portion of federal spending: the entitlement programs. (continues below chart)

    Those who favor sequestration argue that the U.S. spends too much on defense. Yet even without the blind, across-the-board cuts of sequestration, the current state of the U.S. military is still cause for immediate attention. All of the services are in dire need of modernization, be it fighter jets, Navy ships, or body armor.

    Rather than punting on the issue of additional defense cuts—the President’s budget request has already projected a dramatic reduction in security spending—the Obama Administration should work with Congress to legitimately address sequestration before January 2. It should also stop putting the burden of deficit reduction on the back of the defense budget, especially because providing a strong defense falls squarely within the purview of the federal government.

    There is little time left to reach a solution. Paths forward have already been proposed that preserve our national security without unnecessarily burdening Americans. It’s time for the President and Congress to fulfill their constitutional responsibility to provide for the common defense by fully funding our military into the future.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.