• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Indiana's Bittersweet Education Election

    Indiana Superintendent of Schools Tony Bennett is one of the country’s great education reformers. As superintendent, he worked to create one of the most expansive voucher programs in the country, implemented merit pay for teachers, and increased transparency of outcomes in Indiana schools.

    Bennett lost his re-election bid last night and will no longer be at the helm of Indiana’s education system.

    While Bennett was one of the country’s staunchest school choice advocates, at the same time, he succumbed to a very anti-choice effort: the Common Core national standards push. The urging of otherwise conservative education reformers, along with carrots and sticks from the Obama Administration, likely catalyzed his support of the effort.

    Under Bennett’s leadership, Indiana created one of the most robust school choice programs in the country—to the benefit of hundreds of thousands of children in the state. But Indiana’s simultaneous embrace of national standards has created concern about regulations on the private school sector. As The Pioneer Institute’s Jim Stergios noted:

    Indiana has a voucher program. And that voucher program came with the requirement that private, including Catholic, schools had to take state-sanctioned tests. With the transfer over to national standards and tests, private schools now frame their curricula on Common Core and must take the (not yet finished and never field tested!) national tests.

    Bennett’s replacement, Glenda Ritz, opposes Bennett’s heightened emphasis on testing (leaving observers to wonder whether she would oppose Common Core national standards) but also opposes school choice (Ritz had the full support of Indiana’s teachers union). While Ritz could work to divest Indiana of its entanglement with national standards, there is fear that she could also limit the state’s vaunted school choice options.

    This is at the heart of why education reformers closely watching Indiana’s state superintendent race faced a Catch-22: Many have argued that the power of school choice that Bennett championed is limited if all schools are teaching the same curriculum. And what good is the testing freedom Ritz favors absent the ability to choose which school your child attends?

    Hoosiers interested in education reform can take heart, however. Newly elected Governor Mike Pence (R) could be a strong education reform ally, championing school choice and working to limit federal overreach into education by opposing national standards and tests. The Pioneer Institute notes that Pence “has a strong record of not liking Washington mandates. It would be a remarkable about-face if he were to support national standards.”

    With Bennett’s departure, an anti-testing superintendent on the way in, and a conservative governor, Indiana’s involvement with national standards is now in question. Indiana should take the opportunity to put the brakes on its involvement and regain control of its standards and assessments.

    It is unclear whether Bennett’s embrace of national standards contributed to his election loss. But what is certain is that superintendents and governors across the country should think carefully about their support of top-down education initiatives. Parents and teachers see Common Core for what it is: a nationalization of the content taught in local schools and a further entrenchment of Washington-backed testing.

    Indiana has the opportunity to reverse course on Common Core. Newly elected education leaders, governors, and state legislators should also back away from the effort. They should work to reform state standards and tests and, as Bennett did to great acclaim, work to increase educational options for children.

    Here’s hoping that Bennett has the opportunity to continue increasing educational opportunities for children and that state leaders make a hasty retreat from the Common Core national standards movement favored by a centralizing Administration in Washington.

    Posted in Education, Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Indiana's Bittersweet Education Election

    1. O_Henry says:

      The Principle of Unintended Consequences Revisited…

      The control of society and in particular education at the time of Bismarck's Germany removed the very institutions that were capable of checking or at least slowing the rise of the National Socialist Workers Party (Nazis for any leftists who may be reading this) a few years later in Germany.

    2. O2BMe says:

      If the Union supported her then the reforms will probably go out the window. The Unions strongly oppose free choice and the money follow the child. So education in this country will continue to be lower than a lot of other countries.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×