• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Commerce Department Scrutinized for Alleged Whistleblower Retaliation

    House investigators are probing allegations that a Commerce Department agency has retaliated against numerous whistleblowers who spoke out against financial mismanagement by agency officials, Scribe has learned.

    The allegations involve the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Manufacturing Extension Partnership (NIST MEP) program. In a September letter to Commerce’s inspector general, House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) said his committee is investigating allegations “that NIST MEP is targeting certain state centers by withholding matching federal funds to which they are entitled by statute.”

    Issa was referring to state-based MEP Centers, which receive federal funds for consulting services provided to local manufacturing businesses. NIST provides one-third matching grants to 59 regional MEP Centers, meaning for every two allowable dollars an MEP Center spends, it receives one dollar in federal matching funds. The goal of the program is to spur American manufacturing by empowering smaller companies.

    But whistleblowers claim that NIST MEP leadership, under director Roger Kilmer and deputy director Aimee Dobrzeniecki, has misspent agency money and denied MEP Centers matching funds to which they are entitled in order to boost or maintain NIST MEP’s “home office” budget. What’s more, they claim that NIST MEP retaliated against MEP Centers that spoke out against that financial mismanagement.

    “[D]ocuments and information provided by whistleblowers show a range of misconduct by NIST program managers,” Issa wrote, “including: misuse of government credit cards; misuse of appropriated funds for lobbying; retaliation, and; preferential treatment for certain contracts.” Scribe has also obtained documentation supporting the allegations.

    NIST MEP’s budget has increased dramatically over the past five years, but the amount of money going to the MEP Centers themselves has actually declined. In fiscal year 2006, NIST enjoyed $108 million in federal funding for MEP program, of which more than $90 million was disbursed to MEP Centers. By fiscal 2012, its budget was $128 million, with only $87 million marked for those centers.

    Some MEP Centers allege that NIST has avoided sending more money to the centers in order to boost the share of its budget that remains in Washington. “Whatever federal monies these Centers are unable to draw down remains with the NIST home office,” one MEP Center director told Issa in a May letter. “This outcome appears to be intentional on the part of NIST.”

    The tensions between NIST MEP leadership and the MEP Centers came to a head in 2010, when three centers — in Maine, Massachusetts, and Florida — filed a lawsuit attempting to force NIST MEP to implement sections of the 2007 America COMPETES Act designed to boost the share of NIST MEP’s budget going to regional centers.

    The American Small Manufacturers Coalition, a 501(c)6 lobbying organization created by a number of regional MEP Centers, managed to spur congressional action on the issue as well. Twenty-nine senators sent a letter to then-Commerce Secretary Gary Locke in February 2010 noting that NIST MEP was apparently “diverting some of the funds [authorized by America COMPETES] from existing MEP Centers” even though “it is clear that Congress intended this funding to go to” those centers.

    The effort by MEP Centers to expose NIST’s attempts to shore up its home office budget earned those centers the ire of the program’s leadership, they claim. In retaliation, according to a 2009 letter from three MEP Center directors to Commerce’s general counsel, “the NIST MEP Director and officials within the [Commerce Department’s Office of the Inspector General] have coordinated excessive audits on those MEP Centers and their partners that have been leaders in the congressional efforts to restore funding to the MEP Program.”

    “Although there are 59 MEP Centers, the OIG, in the past two years has conducted extensive audits of the Massachusetts MEP Center, the Florida MEP Center, the Texas MEP Center, the South Carolina MEP Center, and the California MEP Center,” the letter notes. “Each of these centers had individuals serving on the original Board of the American Small Manufacturers Coalition…which was the organization that sought to restore MEP Center funding through congressional action.”

    The Center directors claim those audits “were far beyond ‘reasonable’ and were designed instead to harass and intimidate both the MEP Centers and their partners.”

    NIST MEP denies any involvement in the OIG’s audit decisions. “Per standard protocol, NIST MEP was not consulted by the OIG regarding the selection of which centers to audit,” an agency spokesperson told Scribe in an email.

    But one Center director noted that NIST MEP leadership had openly targeted uncooperative MEP Centers. Kilmer and Dobrzeniecki “expressed to more than one ASMC Board member that they were targeting uncooperative individuals by going directly to the MEP Centers where those individuals were employed and threatening those MEP Centers with a loss of funding if they did not take action they demanded,” that director told Issa in an undated letter.

    Other directors noted a similar pattern. “Resources and support [are] not being provided equally to all Centers, but to those who are ‘friends,’” one MEP Center head wrote in May. Another complained of “vindictive and targeted retribution” designed to “punish” that Center “for voicing concerns about the way the national program has been run.”

    Here is Issa’s full letter announcing his committee’s investigation:

    Issa Letter

    Posted in Featured, Ongoing Priorities, Scribe [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Commerce Department Scrutinized for Alleged Whistleblower Retaliation

    1. Bobbie says:

      True admittance of too much government with too many corrupt heads in authority with too much money wasted on issues we the people once handled on our own. It doesn't matter how the truth comes out when it comes to people controlling matters taken from us at costs to us. There's no excuse for deception in any government area controlled beyond our own. Accountability, retribution and elimination necessary!

    2. bjb says:

      Yes, but as always, there is more to the story. MEP has a fiduciary responsibility to the US Taxpayers to achieve a Return on Investment (ROI) on the taxpayer dollars. In fact, it is one of the few, if not the only, federal organization that has to demonstrate such ROI via growth impact measured quarterly at manufactures by a third party, non-governmental organization. For decades the strategy of MEP was to help small and medium sized manufacturers become more efficient at production, using Lean, Six Sigma, and other proven techniques to eliminate waste, shave costs, and become more competitive on the products they already produced. But, in the 21st Century, it is obvious that manufacturers also need to innovate, to decide on new products and services that will bring jobs back to the USA. They can not cost-cut themselves into prosperity. (More to follow)

    3. bjb says:

      MEP evidently searched for a systematic Innovation program, and found it at the Eureka Ranch, which has produced Innovation wonders at many of the world's largest organizations for decades. So, MEP added Growth through Innovation to its strategy, believing that it is the only way to grow value and jobs in the USA. Unfortunately, several MEP centers were happy to just keep pushing more cost cutting, learning to help their clients grow by innovating was just too hard and disruptive for them. So, they did not support the MEP's strategy, and by so doing are bound to find it difficult to meet the minimum impact and ROI requirements. Now they're whining, and they've used the otherwise good services of Congressman Issa and even the Heritage organization to grind their axes. If they are successful in stopping the MEP from helping small and medium sized manufactures learn how to operate in the innovative environment of the 21st Century, they will have foisted a great disservice on the taxpayers and taxpaying manufacturers of this nation. (More to follow)

    4. bjb says:

      I'm a Heritage member, and huge supporter of Congressman Issa. I hate seeing them used by some folks who would rather continue to feed at the governent trough without meeting the needs of taxpayers in the 21st century.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.