• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The U.S. and the Growing Tensions Between China and Japan

    Over the past year, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has managed to antagonize virtually all of its maritime neighbors as ongoing disputes over territorial claims, oceanic borders, and maritime rights have boiled over. None are as potentially dangerous, however, as that between China and Japan, which are becoming ever more committed to their respective claims over the Senkaku Islands.

    The U.S. commitment to its security treaty with Japan means it is potentially our problem, too.

    The situation gained new prominence this past April when, during a speech at The Heritage Foundation on behalf of the Tokyo Metropolitan Government, Governor Shintaro Ishihara offered to buy the islets from their private owners. The Japanese national government chose to defuse Chinese protests over the governor’s move by buying them instead. From Beijing’s perspective, however, Japan’s “nationalization” of the islands (as the Chinese have taken to calling it) did not dampen the problem but exacerbated it.

    That Beijing’s conduct in 2010, when it chose to curtail exports of rare earths over this issue, has alienated much of the region toward the PRC appears utterly lost on the Chinese leadership. Similarly, the Chinese appear to be ignoring the impact of Chinese attacks on Japanese firms and diplomatic facilities on regional perceptions of them as both trading partner and potential threat. The attacks on owners of Japanese cars, and not simply Japanese facilities, highlights the potential for sanctioned and facilitated nationalist demonstrations to metastasize.

    Nonetheless, one way the PRC has avoided inflaming the issue is by not defining the precise boundaries of several of the disputes and keeping its navy out of the mix. But this past week, it shifted its stance.

    Beijing has now issued a definition of the boundaries of the Senkakus and dispatched additional government ships to enforce it. While these ships have been drawn from various civilian, law-enforcement-type agencies (of which there is a myriad, rather bewildering array), some of them are armed. These vessels, in turn, have tried to expel Japanese ships from the area, including Japanese coast guard vessels.

    While the situation has not come to blows, it is clear that tensions are rising, as is the potential for escalation. In particular, it is worrisome that Chinese warnings and escalatory behavior would seem consistent with the potential of introducing military elements into the equation, forcing other states to assess whether they want to escalate (by bringing in their own military forces) or whether they should concede the territories.

    In effect, the Chinese appear intent on placing the onus of the “last move” (to borrow from Thomas Schelling’s writings on deterrence), and avoiding catastrophe, on their adversaries—here, the Japanese.

    Meanwhile, former Chinese ambassador to Japan Chen Jian has now openly accused the United States of fomenting the crisis: “It is in the U.S. interest to quarrel with China, but not to fight with China.” Chen’s remarks imply that Beijing sees the U.S., and not Japan, as the main factor in the Senkaku crisis.

    For the United States, this has serious implications, since the U.S. has underscored that the U.S.–Japan mutual defense treaty applies to the Senkakus, as they are under the “administrative control” of Japan. Chen’s statement suggests that the Chinese are testing American resolve and the limits to its treaty commitments. Does the U.S. stand up to the Chinese on behalf of its legal commitments to Japan, or does it, as it did in the case of the Philippines this summer, force its ally into accommodation?

    The Chinese are likely banking on the latter. If they are right, there is little reason to expect them to step back, and regional security and peace will face a growing threat from an ever more nationalist PRC.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to The U.S. and the Growing Tensions Between China and Japan

    1. Rep Thomas says:

      Isn't it time for sending in US aircraft carriers and nuclear attack submarines to scare the heck of red China so that they know our resolve to protect our allies?

    2. O_Henry says:

      One wonders if very much ot this sort of trouble is what it will take to get the citizenry of the USA to launch a not-made-in-China purchasing embargo at the cash register….

    3. chinese says:

      Do you really understand what is happening? The older leadership of China and Japan agreed that territorial claims of Diaoyu island should be put aside and leave it to the next generation to solve this complex problem. The Japanese breaks the rules now by nationalized these islands, not the Chinese.Why we chinese are so angry over these uninhabited island? The Japanese is practicing pre-war tactics to size territory.
      Diaoyu island is the Japanese war booty as a result of 1st Japanese aggression in Asia. China lost Taiwan and Ryukyu (okinawa)to Japan. Japanese also colonized Korea.The Japanese never repent! if You are on the side with this new neo -imperilialist Japanese , how could you face justice and those heroic Americans who parished in Pacific ?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×