• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • U.S. Missile Defense: The Most Challenging Test Yet

    A Terminal High Altitude Area Defense interceptor is launched from Meck Island on its way to an intercept of a ballistic missile target on Oct. 24, 2012. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)

    On Thursday, the U.S. military conducted a combined developmental and operational test of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system, Patriot Advanced Capability-3 missile defense system, and Aegis ballistic missile defense system.

    This has been the most complex and largest test the U.S. has ever conducted. The missile defense systems engaged five targets simultaneously, including a cruise missile during its course. The test also showed the importance of command and control integration as well as the technological maturity of the missile defense programs.

    The ballistic and cruise missile threats are real. Rogue nations such as Iran and North Korea continue to develop capabilities that can threaten U.S. forward-deployed troops or U.S. allies. Their actions demonstrate the continued need to invest in the ballistic missile defense program.

    Earlier this month, the nation commemorated the 50th anniversary of the Cuban missile crisis. A comprehensive layered missile defense system, preferably space-based, would deny other nations the ability to blackmail the U.S. or its allies and prevent future missile crises from happening.

    The Obama Administration drastically cut the missile defense budget the first year it came into office. Its subsequent budget requests have failed to make up for the lost ground. As Representative Michael Turner (R–OH) observes, the Missile Defense Agency’s projection for fiscal year (FY) 2013–2016 “is $3.6 billion less than even President Obama’s FY12 projection for FY13–16 [from] just last year and $2 billion less than the previous administration projected for FY13.”

    Such a cut, if enacted by Congress, would dramatically reduce U.S. capability to keep up with the evolving ballistic missile threat. The Administration also cut some of the most promising missile defense programs, like the Airborne Laser, the Kinetic Energy Interceptor, and the Multiple Kill Vehicle, which would give the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense a better capability to defeat incoming long-range ballistic missiles.

    It is essential that the U.S. advances its missile defense program faster. The threat is real. The country already has technology that would allow it to protect itself and its allies from adversarial blackmail and coercion.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.