• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Presidential Debate: Where Is Mali, Anyway?

    Less than four minutes into last night’s presidential debate, Governor Mitt Romney listed northern Mali as one of the hot spots affected by the proliferation of international terrorism.

    Romney’s mention of a country in a region of Africa (the Sahel) that few Americans have heard of had many viewers scratching their heads. One of Google’s top searches of the night was “Mali.” Romney’s reference to the Sahel, and northern Mali in particular, highlights the broader implications of the “Arab Spring.”

    Following the fall of the Muammar Qadhafi regime in Libya last October, Tuareg rebels, once loyal to the regime, left Libya and returned to their homelands in Mali and Niger. In Mali, fighters equipped with arms looted from Qadhafi’s stockpiles and quickly organized the separatist group known as the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA).

    Supported by the Islamist Tuareg-led group Ansar Dine, militants launched attacks on Malian military targets. In March 2011, the Malian military launched a coup, ousting the democratically elected president, Amadou Toumani Touré.

    Weeks later, the MNLA declared northern Mali, known as “Azawad,” an independent state. This victory was short-lived, as the ties between the MNLA and Ansar Dine quickly deteriorated. Sidelining the MNLA, Ansar Dine partnered with regional Islamist militants, including Algeria-based al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the Movement for the Oneness and Jihad in West Africa, Boko Haram in Nigeria, and hundreds of foreign fighters from Sudan, Yemen, and even Pakistan. Together, these groups occupied Mali’s northern territory (an area the size of France), enforcing sharia law and meting out brutal punishments to those who resisted.

    The Arab Spring created a number of unintended consequences, including a power vacuum, which provided al-Qaeda and its affiliates with an opportunity to expand their influence. This resurgence of international terrorism contrasts with the Obama Administration’s narrative that al-Qaeda’s influence is on the “decline.” While Osama bin Laden is dead, al-Qaeda is quickly adapting to the challenges created by the loss of its leader.

    The failure to contain this threat could result in new terrorist havens that serve as launching pads for attacks against the U.S. and its allies. U.S. leadership is required to develop a proactive strategy to counter the changing face of terror. Dithering will result in fewer and more difficult options.

    For more information, see “Fixing Mali: Stabilized Governance Should Be the Priority” and “A Counterterrorism Strategy for the “Next Wave.”

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.