• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Guest Post: State Legislators Unite to Defend American Religious Freedom

    Last Tuesday, a bipartisan group of more than 120 legislators in nine states announced the formation of the nation’s first state religious freedom caucuses.

    The announcement comes amid increasing evidence that social hostility and government restrictions against religion are on the rise in the United States, an observation underscored by a study released last month by the Pew Forum on Religion in Public Life. The study’s data add to a growing body of evidence that the worst threats to religious freedom are no longer confined to attacks on Americans’ rights to pray at public events or to display religious symbols in the courthouse or town square.

    The Pew study aptly places many of today’s rising threats in the category of “social hostility” to religion. Hostile, highly vocal groups and individuals are increasingly working to deny clear constitutional rights to certain faith communities.

    Such a group in the Rocky Mountain West banded together to block a county permitting process for the expansion of a private, religious school primarily because the group was hostile to that faith community’s beliefs. The now notorious German attacks against circumcision—which would in practice ban a core ancient rite of both Judaism and Islam—were prefigured last year by attempts by Northern California activists to criminalize circumcision.

    Today’s threats to religious freedom are more dangerous than past threats because they are often driven by government itself. For example, some overreaching state and federal officials have started to impose unprecedented mandates that force religious Americans into the untenable position of having to choose between violating the law and violating their rights of conscience and religious freedoms.

    Religious pharmacists in Illinois and Washington recently won court rulings vindicating their rights of conscience against such mandates—but the administrations in both states are appealing. Over 100 plaintiffs from multiple faith communities are still seeking relief in the courts from the federal “preventive services” mandate that forces religious employers to pay for abortion-inducing drugs and similar products and services that violate their religious freedom and rights of conscience.

    Lawmakers have a key role in addressing threats to religious freedom at the earliest stages. Expensive and demoralizing litigation should not be the only recourse for vindicating core constitutional rights.

    Legislatures in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, and Tennessee now have working groups of lawmakers focused on crafting clear protections for America’s remarkable religious freedoms—and for taking the initiative to stop attacks on those freedoms. By the end of 2013, most if not all of the 50 states will have similar caucuses.

    Whether they are Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, or some other faith, religion is so close to the core of millions of Americans’ identity that even unintentional attacks on religious freedom should be repelled. The 120 legislators of both major parties who formed the nation’s first state religious freedom caucuses are creating a model for doing so in a robust, civil, and bipartisan manner.

    Tim Schultz serves as state legislative policy director for the Ethics and Public Policy Center’s American Religious Freedom Program (www.religiousfreedom.org).

    Posted in Culture [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Guest Post: State Legislators Unite to Defend American Religious Freedom

    1. Bobbie says:

      It's too bad American religious freedom has to be defended by the people who expected this freedom was protected by the peoples' constitution and the government elect! Look at all the time and more money spent fighting the government we pay to serve us as the government spends our money in use against us!!

    2. Hugh_Young says:

      "Religious freedom" is a meaningless term. Religions are not alive and do not have freedom. People have freedom of religion – almost unlimited freedom of belief, and freedom to practise, limited by the human rights of those they want to practise on. So consenting adults have almost unlimited freedom to practise religion on themselves, from handling snakes to drinking poison. On other people not so much, and irreversibly cutting normal healthy parts off other people's bodies, people who will grow up to have their own opinions about what parts of their own bodies they may want to keep, is a bridge too far – something we all agree when the people are baby girls. What difference does the gender of the person make?

    3. Al Connellyl says:

      It is sad to see how rapidly our country is striving toward becoming a "Godless Nation" as evidenced by government actions to remove any evidence of God from public display. The shameful demonstration of the Democratic party members in their convention booing the addition of God to their convention should have been sufficient to cause mass exodus of religious people from the party but instead these people behaved as wayward sheep and ended up being the driving force that supported and re-elected the very individual who is leading this subversive group. We are rapidly becoming a secular socialist nation. When the masses awaken and see what their misguided devotion to the current political forces has dealt it will be too late to recover. Al

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×