• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Israeli Iron Dome Missile Defense Program: A Model to Be Followed

    This week, The Heritage Foundation hosted “Iron Dome: An Examination of the Important Strategic Partnership on Missile Defense Between Israel and the United States.”

    The event focused on the future of the successful U.S.–Israeli missile defense cooperation—especially in the context of the Iron Dome missile defense system—following President Obama’s signature of the United States–Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act into law. The Iron Dome system is designed to counter short-range ballistic missiles and is a part of the Israeli multi-tier missile defense system.

    Lieutenant Colonel Merav Davidovits of the Israeli Missile Defense Organization delivered opening remarks. She focused on the threat environment and the benefits of the Iron Dome system. These include protecting the lives of citizens, national assets, and giving the leadership more time to decide on the most appropriate next course of action.

    Ilan Berman, vice president of the American Foreign Policy Council, focused on the increasingly complex and changing capabilities that Israeli adversaries (especially Hamas and Hezbollah) are acquiring, the scope of their arsenals, and sophistication of their technology.

    Randy Jennings, a defense and media consultant with P-51 Consulting, commented on Capitol Hill’s significantly boosting funding for the program in the latest yet-to-be-signed National Defense Authorization Act. The United States–Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act contains strong language supporting the Iron Dome system. It is one of eight bills Congress has produced supporting Iron Dome.

    Baker Spring, Heritage’s Kirby Research Fellow in National Security Policy, gave remarks on the implications for how the U.S. and its allies see the defense program for countering rockets and missiles. Generally, they can be divided into six categories:

    1. The cost of defensive systems,
    2. Whether the system encourages stability,
    3. Whether it contributes to an effective deterrence posture,
    4. Whether it addresses the moral obligation to protect civilians,
    5. The appropriate architecture for rocket and missile defenses, and
    6. How the U.S. and its allies think about their respective defense budgets.

    It is important to sustain the current level of congressional support for Iron Dome and broader Israeli missile defense cooperation as Iran continues to advance its ballistic missile program. Elevating Iron Dome to a joint U.S.–Israeli production program would help to ensure its continued support. In addition, such an arrangement could serve the dual purpose of advancing technology and limiting the costs for both Israel and the U.S.

    Nick Baranishyn is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Israeli Iron Dome Missile Defense Program: A Model to Be Followed

    1. What might be the cost of a joint US-Israel production program to the US's ability to work with other players in the region? Might we be seen as further one-sided in our stance on all things Arab-Israeli conflict and is that a problem? Perhaps it's just a drop in the bucket?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×