• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • 5 Myths About Voting

    Last night, the presidential candidates wrestled with questions from ordinary Americans. Next week, they will debate foreign policy.

    Alas, for some viewers, these exchanges come too late—they’ve already cast their ballots and can’t change their votes.

    If you think early voting is a healthy trend, just read on, as we explode five myths about voting.

    Myth #1: Early voting is good for the republic.

    In 32 states and the District of Columbia, people have been voting for weeks. “The easier it is to vote, the more people will vote, and that will be good for our democracy,” according to one editorial in North Carolina.

    Yet early voting doesn’t increase voter turnout. At most, “early voting does encourage turnout among regular voters for low-intensity contests, but it does not help solve the participation puzzle for new voters or those outside the system,” notes Paul Gronke, a political science professor at Reed College.

    Moreover, early voting erodes the democratic process. As National Review argues, it “exaggerates the advantages of having the early money lead, preexisting ground game, and known-quantity name recognition of the incumbent.” More than that, it curtails the deliberative process: Voters who cast ballots in September can’t change their minds later.

    Myth #2: Voter fraud is inconsequential.

    “Fraud by individual voters is both irrational and extremely rare,” argues a policy brief published by the Brennan Center for Justice.

    But Hans von Spakovsky and John Fund point to several examples of voter fraud in their latest book: In 1982, 100,000 fraudulent votes were cast in Chicago, plenty to swing the outcome of the state’s gubernatorial election. Then there’s the 14-year vote fraud conspiracy in Brooklyn, New York, that resulted in thousands of fraudulent ballots being cast in state and federal legislative races through impersonation fraud.

    Von Spakovsky and Fund suggest a few measures to guard against fraud: require voters to authenticate their identity, verify that voters are citizens, alter qualifications for absentee voting, and ensure that databases are accurate.

    Preventing voter fraud should not be a partisan issue: Whether fraud is Democratic or Republican or located in the North, South, East, or West, it damages democracy.

    Myth #3: The Electoral College is an outdated, inadequate method of selecting the President.

    In most presidential election years, somebody complains about the Electoral College. It’s called “outdated,” “unfair” or “a cancerous tumor on American democracy.”

    No, it isn’t. Imbued with the ideals of this nation’s Founders, the Electoral College is the best selection system for our federal republic.

    The Electoral College requires a presidential candidate to win simultaneous elections across 50 states and the District of Columbia. This promotes federalism by ensuring that each state matters in the presidential election. Candidates who focus too narrowly on a handful of states, regions, or metropolitan population centers will not be successful in the Electoral College.

    Finally, it grants definitive electoral outcomes. The Electoral College magnifies the margin of victory for presidential candidates and, therefore, confers a sense of legitimacy to the new President.

    Myth #4: Not so long ago, only white, male property owners could vote.

    Let’s get the facts straight: The Constitution grants states—not Congress—the power to determine the qualifications of voters for federal elections. Women were voting in New Jersey in the late 1700s. Free blacks were voting in at least five of the 13 states in the early republic.

    Myth #5: Voting does not matter.

    It’s easy to insist that voting “doesn’t matter at all.” Statistically, you are more likely to win the lottery than to cast the tie-breaking vote in the presidential election. But, as the editors of National Review explain, “the more people believe their vote doesn’t count, the less true it becomes—and such a universalization would be fatal to democracy.”

    Voting is an event. “The electorate comes together as a whole to make a decision at a particular moment in time.” It’s a key part of self-government: Through elections, citizens express consent for their representatives. Your vote counts—at the very least as a matter of self-government.

    So don’t vote early or often. Do your civic duty on November 6 and understand that you’re contributing to a rich American tradition of republican (small r) government. We’ll see you there.

    Posted in Featured, First Principles [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to 5 Myths About Voting

    1. george4908 says:

      >>Candidates who focus too narrowly on a handful of states, regions, or metropolitan population centers will not be successful in the Electoral College.

      Have to disagree with this one. The Electoral College calculations are precisely what's driving the candidates' emphasis on a handful of swing states. New York not in play? No reason for either candidates to campaign or advertise there, then. Direct popular vote isn't necessarily a cure-all. It would probably mean that both candidates have to go to New York because of the large population, but then larger urban areas would get all the attention and and rural areas might be ignored.

      >>Finally, it grants definitive electoral outcomes. The Electoral College magnifies the margin of victory for presidential candidates and, therefore, confers a sense of legitimacy to the new President.

      Except when it doesn't. Just ask Al Gore.

    2. Jeanne Stotler says:

      Believe me voter faud is alive and well, just this past Tues., my oldest son was called by the local Dem. office, They wanted to send him a ballot, to fill out, sign AND RETURN TO THEM. That’s right return to the Dem. office. He’s a registered Rep and plans to voe for Romney/ Ryan, can anyone guess where his vote would have gone?? If this isn’t FRAUD what is??.

    3. usg employee says:

      One thing early voting does do is allow people who want to vote from being disenfranchised because they cannot get to the polls on election day. People like most of those in military service. The majority of the USG diplomatic corps. Perhaps some of the arguments in support of early voting are specious, but those of us need it truly appreciate the ability.

      • CforUS says:

        "Early" voting should be limited to only 7 days prior to election day. Any more than that and you risk voters being "disenfrachised" by not having the ability to change their vote. After watching the 2nd debate the other night my wife (a down the line "D" voter) complained that she couldn't change her vote now that it had already been sent in. We need to get one thing absolutely clear here. Early voting has nothing to do with absentee voting. I'm a govt. employee currently overseas. I sent in my absentee ballot weeks ago. My son, living in the U.S., decided to do an absentee ballot so he could vote early. I didn't think, and I still don't think, he needed to vote early. He could make his schedule up to fit his availabillity to get into the polling station on election day. If you have the ability to make it to the polling station on election day, it's your duty to do so. If you decide it's not important enough to get in to vote, that's your fault, and you can't claim being disenfranchised.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.