• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Cyber Legislation's Groundhog Day

    Senate majority leader Harry Reid (D–NV) has announced that the Senate will again consider cybersecurity legislation when it returns from its election recess. The move comes in response to another in a series of apocalyptic pronouncements about our cyber vulnerabilities—this one from Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, who is warning of an imminent “cyber Pearl Harbor.”

    We may be forgiven just a small bit of skepticism about the timing of this announcement and its intent. To be sure, vulnerabilities in cyberspace are very real. The recent Shamoon attack on the Saudi oil giant Aramco by Iran left 30,000 computers completely wiped out.

    But that doesn’t mean that a crisis is brewing. After all, the phrase “cyber Pearl Harbor” (or some variant of it) has been around for nearly 20 years—the earliest use we know of is in June 1996.

    So what is the Reid announcement really about? If it portended a real effort at finding common ground, that would be a good sign. But it isn’t an offer of compromise. To the contrary, Senator Reid used his statement to blame Republicans for the delay in action: “Cybersecurity is an issue that should be handled by Congress, but with Republicans engaging in Tea Party-motivated obstruction, I believe that President Obama is right to examine all means at his disposal for confronting this urgent national security threat.” That kind of name calling just heightens the likelihood of another confrontation without any resolution.

    If the Senate were looking for results instead of talking points, they would recognize that there are plenty of reasons to think that cybersecurity regulation by the government is not a good thing. And there is widespread agreement that some types of reform are essential (information sharing, for example).

    If Senator Reid were serious about seeking legislation, he would try to forthrightly address the concerns of those who think the regulatory proposals are problematic. Instead he just wants to join in the chorus of crisis.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×