• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • United Nations Conceals Inconvenient Salary Data

    The International Civil Service Commission (ICSC) recently updated its information on salaries for U.N. personnel, but it is concealing some very important information.

    Earlier this week, I wrote a paper using U.N. information detailing how net remuneration for U.N. professional staff is 31.3 percent higher than that of theirU.S. equivalents inWashington and urging theU.S. to call for a pay freeze until U.N. salaries fall to the level ofU.S. civil servants.

    This salary information comes from the annex of a report by the ICSC. Ambassador Joseph Torsella, U.S. Representative to the United Nations on Management and Reform, highlighted this information earlier this year, stating that U.N. employees “deserve to be properly compensated for their work.… But with average UN professional pay now at nearly 130% of averageUS federal civil-service pay inWashington—the system is becoming seriously distorted.”

    I followed up this past July when the ICSC was meeting to determine U.N. compensation for the upcoming period and specifically highlighted the ICSC table with the salary comparison. (See Annex VI p. 75 here.) My latest paper on this topic highlights updated data from the advance 2012 report. (See Annex VI p. 88 here.)

    However, the 2012 annex does not include the column included in the previous report comparing U.N. salaries versus their Washington-based U.S. equivalents. Instead, the ICSC presented only the data that incorporated its cost-of-living adjustment forNew York. A new footnote provided the information necessary to calculate the Washington comparison, but it requires additional effort and some basic math.

    The result was to conceal the salary discrepancy highlighted by Ambassador Torsella and The Heritage Foundation. The most reasonable motivation behind this change is to prevent easy access to inconvenient data. The 2012 ICSC report is an advance copy, hopefully the final version will correct this clumsy attempt at obfuscation.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to United Nations Conceals Inconvenient Salary Data

    1. Ron Swaren says:

      It's expensive to live in NYC. Plus they have a lot of differing viewpoints to work under. I wonder how those salaries compare to NYC incomes?

    2. ed taylor says:

      if you want to make an accurate comparison of government employment salaries and benefits with the private sectors', make comparisons at the initial stages of employment and after 10, 15, and 20 years. Private sector employees do not have built in in-steps like the public sector. A public sector receptionist will, after 20 years, earn double her salary as a result of automatic instep benefits. The nature and quality of work need be no different than the first day of employment. These in-step benefits were introduced into the federal pay system in the late 1950's by a congressman named Richard Ramspect because of political cowardice. Prior thereto, federal employees received raises only through acts of Congress.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×